23:2223:22, 25 February 2014diffhist+10
President of Ukraine
I don't agree. Please do explain why disputed need not be added when it is disputed, and when it has been shown that in accordance with the Constitution of Ukraine Yanukovich is the de jure President?Tag: gettingstarted edit
11:3011:30, 25 February 2014diffhist+10
President of Ukraine
"....the voting system recognized that the impeachment was LEGAL", according to who, based on what law or article of the Constitution?Tag: gettingstarted edit
22:5422:54, 24 February 2014diffhist+10
President of Ukraine
No need for "Disputed"? Why? The alternative is to question once again the whole article and replace Yanukovych as the de jure legitimate President. 328 MP's voted for removal, 338 were legally required. How is Turchynov the de jure Acting President?Tag: gettingstarted edit
22:1322:13, 24 February 2014diffhist+10
President of Ukraine
I think we have to agree to disagree, I am ok with leaving it as it is with the so-called Acting President, as long as "Disputed" appears (as I have now edited). Think that is a compromise.Tag: gettingstarted edit
21:3421:34, 24 February 2014diffhist−203
President of Ukraine
Reasons for edit explained in Talk. Parliament acted illegally, Yanukovych is still de jure President. Opposition entered legally binding agreement accepting such.Tag: gettingstarted edit
08:2508:25, 24 February 2014diffhist−81
President of Ukraine
Viktor Yanukovych is the legal President of Ukraine, page relates to the "President of Ukraine", not the "Acting President of Ukraine". Arguably pursuant to Constitution of Ukraine, parliament has acted illegally and Yanukovych is still de jure PresidentTag: gettingstarted edit
23:2223:22, 25 February 2014diffhist+10
President of Ukraine
I don't agree. Please do explain why disputed need not be added when it is disputed, and when it has been shown that in accordance with the Constitution of Ukraine Yanukovich is the de jure President?Tag: gettingstarted edit
11:3011:30, 25 February 2014diffhist+10
President of Ukraine
"....the voting system recognized that the impeachment was LEGAL", according to who, based on what law or article of the Constitution?Tag: gettingstarted edit
22:5422:54, 24 February 2014diffhist+10
President of Ukraine
No need for "Disputed"? Why? The alternative is to question once again the whole article and replace Yanukovych as the de jure legitimate President. 328 MP's voted for removal, 338 were legally required. How is Turchynov the de jure Acting President?Tag: gettingstarted edit
22:1322:13, 24 February 2014diffhist+10
President of Ukraine
I think we have to agree to disagree, I am ok with leaving it as it is with the so-called Acting President, as long as "Disputed" appears (as I have now edited). Think that is a compromise.Tag: gettingstarted edit
21:3421:34, 24 February 2014diffhist−203
President of Ukraine
Reasons for edit explained in Talk. Parliament acted illegally, Yanukovych is still de jure President. Opposition entered legally binding agreement accepting such.Tag: gettingstarted edit
08:2508:25, 24 February 2014diffhist−81
President of Ukraine
Viktor Yanukovych is the legal President of Ukraine, page relates to the "President of Ukraine", not the "Acting President of Ukraine". Arguably pursuant to Constitution of Ukraine, parliament has acted illegally and Yanukovych is still de jure PresidentTag: gettingstarted edit