17:1817:18, 15 March 2016diffhist+7
m
Magna Carta
Undid revision 664081058 by
Hchc2009 (
talk) As per my point, serfs weren't completely excluded. See clauses 16, 20, 28. Adding 'mainly' is more accurate, otherwise the statement is misleading.
17:0417:04, 3 December 2014diffhist−148
History of chess
→Origin: will let Xianqi edit go for now but removing three extremely weak refs from Gupta empire. They don't belong in a serious & credible article article.
11:0811:08, 2 December 2014diffhist+277
History of chess
Undid revision 636252325 by
J S Ayer (
talk) As stated on the talk page the sources in the xiangqi are more detailed and numerous than Indian invention. Orig research & 3 bogus India refs removed.
17:1817:18, 15 March 2016diffhist+7
m
Magna Carta
Undid revision 664081058 by
Hchc2009 (
talk) As per my point, serfs weren't completely excluded. See clauses 16, 20, 28. Adding 'mainly' is more accurate, otherwise the statement is misleading.
17:0417:04, 3 December 2014diffhist−148
History of chess
→Origin: will let Xianqi edit go for now but removing three extremely weak refs from Gupta empire. They don't belong in a serious & credible article article.
11:0811:08, 2 December 2014diffhist+277
History of chess
Undid revision 636252325 by
J S Ayer (
talk) As stated on the talk page the sources in the xiangqi are more detailed and numerous than Indian invention. Orig research & 3 bogus India refs removed.