03:4503:45, 10 April 2024diffhist0
m
DUSTWUN
For great grammar. This was not *incorrect* but "occur" was quite far from the rest of the clause it belonged with, far enough to *look* incorrectcurrent
07:3807:38, 15 February 2024diffhist−394
Neill Blomkamp
→Career: The cite said Fox was 'reassessing the franchise but did not even imply Neill's movie might be resurrected. Therefore there is either a NPOV problem, or an original research problem, with using that as the basis for saying it might be alive again.
03:4503:45, 10 April 2024diffhist0
m
DUSTWUN
For great grammar. This was not *incorrect* but "occur" was quite far from the rest of the clause it belonged with, far enough to *look* incorrectcurrent
07:3807:38, 15 February 2024diffhist−394
Neill Blomkamp
→Career: The cite said Fox was 'reassessing the franchise but did not even imply Neill's movie might be resurrected. Therefore there is either a NPOV problem, or an original research problem, with using that as the basis for saying it might be alive again.