20:5920:59, 15 February 2020diffhist−561
Pannonia
→Name: Removed entire segment about Pannonia originating from "Pan's land" because it sounded as a mix of pseudo history and folk etymology (not to mention no source was offered for this claim). It is uncertain if Pan was even a slavic/indo european word or loanword from Avar words like bayan and kyoban. As for "Pan Ionian" segment, it is incredibly far fetched.Tag: Visual edit
15:5815:58, 15 February 2020diffhist+1,217
Dalmatia (Roman province)
→List of governors of Dalmatia: Added several more governors. The first one Vibius Postumus (Marcus Aemilius Lepidus was probably first governor of Pannonia rather than Dalmatia), Marcus Servilius, attested in an inscription in Bosnia and 3 other governors who were already in category page for governors of Dalmatia.Tag: Visual edit
07:4207:42, 1 February 2020diffhist−11
Kingdom of East Anglia
→Settlement: Not cited any source for claim that by 450 AD Angles already settled East Anglia. Some claim much later dates than 450 others earlier, only the period between 500 and 520 is without any doubt, so it's best to leave it ambiguous. It was certainly settled before much of the interior.
18:3918:39, 31 December 2019diffhist+77
Björn Ironside
→Other sources: Scaldingi as used in the chronicles could literally refer to Scyldings who were known to English chroniclers and readers as well as other Norse dynasties evidenced in their appearance in Beowulf. It was far more familiar term than the river Schelde
08:2808:28, 7 December 2019diffhist−167
Vortigern
→Historia Brittonum: Removed the sentence which implied that Oxfordshire in the interior is more logical place of origin of Saxon invasion than maritime Kent. Said sentence made no sense and there was no source for such a claim.
16:0316:03, 21 July 2019diffhist−14
m
De Administrando Imperio
→Content: Bosniaks exist since about 1993 under that name. As for medieval Bosnians their identity was in eternal flux. It never managed to fully coalesche into completely separate identity from Serbs and/or Croats judging by charters of Ninoslav and Tvrtko who regard their subjects as Serbs albeit catholic ones. However certain vassals regarded themselves as Croats judging by personal names and there was probably a regional identity. However that's only in later period. In 10th century,nope
20:5920:59, 15 February 2020diffhist−561
Pannonia
→Name: Removed entire segment about Pannonia originating from "Pan's land" because it sounded as a mix of pseudo history and folk etymology (not to mention no source was offered for this claim). It is uncertain if Pan was even a slavic/indo european word or loanword from Avar words like bayan and kyoban. As for "Pan Ionian" segment, it is incredibly far fetched.Tag: Visual edit
15:5815:58, 15 February 2020diffhist+1,217
Dalmatia (Roman province)
→List of governors of Dalmatia: Added several more governors. The first one Vibius Postumus (Marcus Aemilius Lepidus was probably first governor of Pannonia rather than Dalmatia), Marcus Servilius, attested in an inscription in Bosnia and 3 other governors who were already in category page for governors of Dalmatia.Tag: Visual edit
07:4207:42, 1 February 2020diffhist−11
Kingdom of East Anglia
→Settlement: Not cited any source for claim that by 450 AD Angles already settled East Anglia. Some claim much later dates than 450 others earlier, only the period between 500 and 520 is without any doubt, so it's best to leave it ambiguous. It was certainly settled before much of the interior.
18:3918:39, 31 December 2019diffhist+77
Björn Ironside
→Other sources: Scaldingi as used in the chronicles could literally refer to Scyldings who were known to English chroniclers and readers as well as other Norse dynasties evidenced in their appearance in Beowulf. It was far more familiar term than the river Schelde
08:2808:28, 7 December 2019diffhist−167
Vortigern
→Historia Brittonum: Removed the sentence which implied that Oxfordshire in the interior is more logical place of origin of Saxon invasion than maritime Kent. Said sentence made no sense and there was no source for such a claim.
16:0316:03, 21 July 2019diffhist−14
m
De Administrando Imperio
→Content: Bosniaks exist since about 1993 under that name. As for medieval Bosnians their identity was in eternal flux. It never managed to fully coalesche into completely separate identity from Serbs and/or Croats judging by charters of Ninoslav and Tvrtko who regard their subjects as Serbs albeit catholic ones. However certain vassals regarded themselves as Croats judging by personal names and there was probably a regional identity. However that's only in later period. In 10th century,nope