13:5313:53, 1 April 2015diffhist−72
m
Cash Cash
Research shows the 2 releases were only licensed to Twilight in the territory of Japan and self released worldwide. They were never signed to the label. More appropriate to list this detail in the disco credits vs infobox.
7 March 2015
18:5618:56, 7 March 2015diffhist+26
m
Cash Cash
EDM is the abbreviation for Electronic Dance Music so it’s nice to clarify it somewhere. I don’t mind what spot. Listing the USA Today article as the source.
05:1205:12, 11 September 2014diffhist−35
Cash Cash
→Style: Restoring a justified edit. Recent discussion on the talk page gives valid reasoning why. This is the compromise that respects every editor involved.
12:3412:34, 22 August 2014diffhist−239
Cash Cash
→Style: Removing puff/redundancy and clarified that it's the first album being spoken about to avoid confusion. Please see the talk page for more. This is fair guys.
05:3305:33, 19 August 2014diffhist−44
Cash Cash
→Style: Simplified for less redundancy and clarified the material being spoken about by adding "first album" to avoid any confusion.
04:5504:55, 19 August 2014diffhist−195
Cash Cash
→Style: I won’t dispute the styles but I’m removing some puff review content that is unnecessary. Let’s make extra effort to keep this section as neutral as possible.
07:2607:26, 29 July 2014diffhist+674
Cash Cash
I converted their remix and production work into a table. It looks a lot more professional now and fits the format of the article better.
13:5313:53, 1 April 2015diffhist−72
m
Cash Cash
Research shows the 2 releases were only licensed to Twilight in the territory of Japan and self released worldwide. They were never signed to the label. More appropriate to list this detail in the disco credits vs infobox.
7 March 2015
18:5618:56, 7 March 2015diffhist+26
m
Cash Cash
EDM is the abbreviation for Electronic Dance Music so it’s nice to clarify it somewhere. I don’t mind what spot. Listing the USA Today article as the source.
05:1205:12, 11 September 2014diffhist−35
Cash Cash
→Style: Restoring a justified edit. Recent discussion on the talk page gives valid reasoning why. This is the compromise that respects every editor involved.
12:3412:34, 22 August 2014diffhist−239
Cash Cash
→Style: Removing puff/redundancy and clarified that it's the first album being spoken about to avoid confusion. Please see the talk page for more. This is fair guys.
05:3305:33, 19 August 2014diffhist−44
Cash Cash
→Style: Simplified for less redundancy and clarified the material being spoken about by adding "first album" to avoid any confusion.
04:5504:55, 19 August 2014diffhist−195
Cash Cash
→Style: I won’t dispute the styles but I’m removing some puff review content that is unnecessary. Let’s make extra effort to keep this section as neutral as possible.
07:2607:26, 29 July 2014diffhist+674
Cash Cash
I converted their remix and production work into a table. It looks a lot more professional now and fits the format of the article better.