04:2304:23, 31 October 2023diffhist+5
Multiplicity (subculture)
"Tulpamancy" is western word and the article that was linked to didn't talk abt the tibetan practice so I linked it the page about the tibetan practice and not the page about western tulpamancyTag: Visual edit
04:2104:21, 31 October 2023diffhist−3,141
Multiplicity (subculture)
→Links to iatrogenesis: The majority of this section is in relation to DID diagnosis and social media . Multiplicity itself is not a clinical diagnosis and according to current papers on the topic should be thought of as a spectrum of experiences hence it is better to put the iatrogensis section in the DID wikipedia article. Not to mention none of the sources mention IatrogensisTag: Visual edit
04:1304:13, 31 October 2023diffhist−1,565
Multiplicity (subculture)
→Characteristics: The entire section of "who is considered a system is entirely original research none of the sources cited pose the question "who is considered a system?" and instead it just a cut and stitch of various papers that have nothing to with each other and don't lead back to the main question of "who is considered a system"Tag: Visual edit
04:3004:30, 26 August 2023diffhist−1
Tulpa
I moved the setence to the section regarding spirtual tulpas since that is what the book was describing slender man to be: A tulpa made via collective thought which is apart of the western spirtual/occult practices of tulpa and is distinct from the western tulpa imaginary friend community.Tag: Visual edit
04:2304:23, 31 October 2023diffhist+5
Multiplicity (subculture)
"Tulpamancy" is western word and the article that was linked to didn't talk abt the tibetan practice so I linked it the page about the tibetan practice and not the page about western tulpamancyTag: Visual edit
04:2104:21, 31 October 2023diffhist−3,141
Multiplicity (subculture)
→Links to iatrogenesis: The majority of this section is in relation to DID diagnosis and social media . Multiplicity itself is not a clinical diagnosis and according to current papers on the topic should be thought of as a spectrum of experiences hence it is better to put the iatrogensis section in the DID wikipedia article. Not to mention none of the sources mention IatrogensisTag: Visual edit
04:1304:13, 31 October 2023diffhist−1,565
Multiplicity (subculture)
→Characteristics: The entire section of "who is considered a system is entirely original research none of the sources cited pose the question "who is considered a system?" and instead it just a cut and stitch of various papers that have nothing to with each other and don't lead back to the main question of "who is considered a system"Tag: Visual edit
04:3004:30, 26 August 2023diffhist−1
Tulpa
I moved the setence to the section regarding spirtual tulpas since that is what the book was describing slender man to be: A tulpa made via collective thought which is apart of the western spirtual/occult practices of tulpa and is distinct from the western tulpa imaginary friend community.Tag: Visual edit