15:3115:31, 29 September 2019diffhist−24
Charles K. Armstrong
→Career: Modified an unsourced detail that was precise. There is nothing in sources cited later in the entry that states that the sabbatical was related to the plagiarism findings of the investigation, which is sufficiently discussed later in the entry.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
00:3500:35, 25 September 2019diffhist−3
Charles K. Armstrong
Undid revision 917665130 by
Zanhe (
talk) Redid an in-good-faith supplement to a previous revision in order to make the entry have an introduction that accurately reflects the sequence of events. Users who have an objection to this are asked to utilize the Talk function.Tag: Undo
24 September 2019
21:3621:36, 24 September 2019diffhist−3
Charles K. Armstrong
The previous revision does not reflect the contents of the entry sufficiently. If the emphasis is on plagiarism and citation fabrication, then "uncover" does not reflect the official reason given for the return of the Fairbank award at the time, which was citation errors.
11:2511:25, 13 September 2019diffhist−752
Charles K. Armstrong
The previous description violated the "Tone" section of wikipedia's "biographies of living persons" by not writing "responsibly, cautiously, and in a dispassionate tone." It also uses "controversial or effusive descriptions" that are not used in the reliable sources.
11:0211:02, 13 September 2019diffhist−2,764
Charles K. Armstrong
This section violates the Biographies of Living Persons because it is based on contentious material that is poorly source and supported by a self-published source.
15:3115:31, 29 September 2019diffhist−24
Charles K. Armstrong
→Career: Modified an unsourced detail that was precise. There is nothing in sources cited later in the entry that states that the sabbatical was related to the plagiarism findings of the investigation, which is sufficiently discussed later in the entry.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
00:3500:35, 25 September 2019diffhist−3
Charles K. Armstrong
Undid revision 917665130 by
Zanhe (
talk) Redid an in-good-faith supplement to a previous revision in order to make the entry have an introduction that accurately reflects the sequence of events. Users who have an objection to this are asked to utilize the Talk function.Tag: Undo
24 September 2019
21:3621:36, 24 September 2019diffhist−3
Charles K. Armstrong
The previous revision does not reflect the contents of the entry sufficiently. If the emphasis is on plagiarism and citation fabrication, then "uncover" does not reflect the official reason given for the return of the Fairbank award at the time, which was citation errors.
11:2511:25, 13 September 2019diffhist−752
Charles K. Armstrong
The previous description violated the "Tone" section of wikipedia's "biographies of living persons" by not writing "responsibly, cautiously, and in a dispassionate tone." It also uses "controversial or effusive descriptions" that are not used in the reliable sources.
11:0211:02, 13 September 2019diffhist−2,764
Charles K. Armstrong
This section violates the Biographies of Living Persons because it is based on contentious material that is poorly source and supported by a self-published source.