A user with 20,988 edits. Account created on 7 December 2003.
11 March 2024
- 14:54 14:54, 11 March 2024 diff hist −941 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →"There is also disagreement about whether the effect is real at all": different answer entirely + I'm going to have to go off and think more ;-)
- 14:31 14:31, 11 March 2024 diff hist +466 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →"There is also disagreement about whether the effect is real at all"
- 14:20 14:20, 11 March 2024 diff hist +611 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →"There is also disagreement about whether the effect is real at all": I agree that scientists couch their criticisms and use polite language.
10 March 2024
- 14:04 14:04, 10 March 2024 diff hist +788 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →"There is also disagreement about whether the effect is real at all": thanks to Phlsph7 , + accidentally lost a cite?
- 13:57 13:57, 10 March 2024 diff hist −33 Dunning–Kruger effect →Statistical and better-than-average effect: I don't think one can quite get away with "has been criticized on methodological grounds" when it's Dunning himself doing the criticizing in a response article. ;-)
9 March 2024
- 15:05 15:05, 9 March 2024 diff hist +24 m Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →"There is also disagreement about whether the effect is real at all": +meanwhile
- 15:04 15:04, 9 March 2024 diff hist +266 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →"There is also disagreement about whether the effect is real at all": Reply Tag: Reply
- 10:35 10:35, 9 March 2024 diff hist +370 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: Reply Tag: Reply
- 10:16 10:16, 9 March 2024 diff hist +107 Dunning–Kruger effect →Statistical: I'm still not happy with this wording, but it's a lot better
- 09:58 09:58, 9 March 2024 diff hist +5 m Dunning–Kruger effect →Statistical: should/could
- 09:57 09:57, 9 March 2024 diff hist +38 Dunning–Kruger effect More careful wording to stress that According to Jarry's Reporting/ summary of the situation is it fully debunked. (and that Gaze is a bit more nuanced: people's interpretation of the paper has been overbroad, but a narrow reading may still be correct. )
- 02:22 02:22, 9 March 2024 diff hist +8 m Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: <s></s>
- 02:19 02:19, 9 March 2024 diff hist +376 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: Reply Tag: Reply
- 02:15 02:15, 9 March 2024 diff hist −27 Dunning–Kruger effect →Statistical: I'm really not happy with this wording, but it does meet minimum requirements to be left in .. I *think*.
- 01:39 01:39, 9 March 2024 diff hist +223 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: sign again, since I've edited my comment based on updates
- 01:32 01:32, 9 March 2024 diff hist −24 Dunning–Kruger effect →Statistical: more npov wording/ (was slightly misleading)
- 01:32 01:32, 9 March 2024 diff hist −55 m Dunning–Kruger effect →Statistical: found 2 different references to same article
- 01:22 01:22, 9 March 2024 diff hist +70 Dunning–Kruger effect →Statistical
- 01:18 01:18, 9 March 2024 diff hist +200 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation
- 01:16 01:16, 9 March 2024 diff hist −89 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect re - sign with logged in
28 November 2023
- 05:39 05:39, 28 November 2023 diff hist +2 m Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: sp
- 05:39 05:39, 28 November 2023 diff hist +135 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: reword some more
- 05:23 05:23, 28 November 2023 diff hist +1 m Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation
- 05:22 05:22, 28 November 2023 diff hist −234 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: rewording to be closer to what the paper actually says.
- 05:14 05:14, 28 November 2023 diff hist +26 m Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: +ref
- 04:57 04:57, 28 November 2023 diff hist +680 User talk:Gwern →For some reason I'm discussing minutiae of Dunning-Kruger, and I blame you.: new section Tag: New topic
- 04:41 04:41, 28 November 2023 diff hist +531 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: replying to Constant314: Scientists often word things very carefully.
- 04:27 04:27, 28 November 2023 diff hist +368 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: Reply Tag: Reply
27 November 2023
- 13:23 13:23, 27 November 2023 diff hist 0 m Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation
- 13:20 13:20, 27 November 2023 diff hist +34 m Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation
- 13:18 13:18, 27 November 2023 diff hist +639 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: Reply Tag: Reply
- 13:06 13:06, 27 November 2023 diff hist +1,983 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: Reply Tag: Reply
- 11:48 11:48, 27 November 2023 diff hist +55 m Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation
- 11:46 11:46, 27 November 2023 diff hist −37 Dunning–Kruger effect And... read the papers through and found somewhat more careful wording. Tag: Reverted
- 11:41 11:41, 27 November 2023 diff hist −5 m Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation
- 11:40 11:40, 27 November 2023 diff hist +852 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: Annnd... just came back from reading papers
- 11:24 11:24, 27 November 2023 diff hist +643 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: Additional (possibly redundant) request for more detail here.
- 11:18 11:18, 27 November 2023 diff hist +1,023 Dunning–Kruger effect rv (1RR/BRD) Re-checking contents of each of the papers, I'm not entirely sure why refs were removed/reverted. I left a note on the talk page as well. I'd be interested to see what the explicit issues are (on the talk page) Tags: Manual revert Reverted harv-error
- 00:39 00:39, 27 November 2023 diff hist +1 m Dunning–Kruger effect + full stop Tag: Reverted
- 00:38 00:38, 27 November 2023 diff hist +22 m Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: + why I say that
- 00:37 00:37, 27 November 2023 diff hist +51 m Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation
- 00:35 00:35, 27 November 2023 diff hist −2 m Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: better wording
- 00:34 00:34, 27 November 2023 diff hist +947 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation
- 00:25 00:25, 27 November 2023 diff hist +395 m Dunning–Kruger effect pp->loc add paper titles. Tag: Reverted
- 00:15 00:15, 27 November 2023 diff hist +233 Dunning–Kruger effect 2 more refs Tag: Reverted
- 00:06 00:06, 27 November 2023 diff hist −2 m Dunning–Kruger effect papers/authors Tag: Reverted
- 00:05 00:05, 27 November 2023 diff hist +396 Dunning–Kruger effect Adding Blair Fix position ... Blair Fix cites their sources. We already have Gignac here, but there's 2 more that I need to check before adding. see also Talk:Dunning–Kruger_effect#DK_Effect_is_Simply_Autocorrelation Tags: Reverted harv-error
8 November 2023
- 22:04 22:04, 8 November 2023 diff hist +585 User talk:Bawolff →How Wikipedia became the last good place on the internet: new section Tag: New topic
30 August 2023
A user with 20,988 edits. Account created on 7 December 2003.
11 March 2024
- 14:54 14:54, 11 March 2024 diff hist −941 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →"There is also disagreement about whether the effect is real at all": different answer entirely + I'm going to have to go off and think more ;-)
- 14:31 14:31, 11 March 2024 diff hist +466 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →"There is also disagreement about whether the effect is real at all"
- 14:20 14:20, 11 March 2024 diff hist +611 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →"There is also disagreement about whether the effect is real at all": I agree that scientists couch their criticisms and use polite language.
10 March 2024
- 14:04 14:04, 10 March 2024 diff hist +788 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →"There is also disagreement about whether the effect is real at all": thanks to Phlsph7 , + accidentally lost a cite?
- 13:57 13:57, 10 March 2024 diff hist −33 Dunning–Kruger effect →Statistical and better-than-average effect: I don't think one can quite get away with "has been criticized on methodological grounds" when it's Dunning himself doing the criticizing in a response article. ;-)
9 March 2024
- 15:05 15:05, 9 March 2024 diff hist +24 m Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →"There is also disagreement about whether the effect is real at all": +meanwhile
- 15:04 15:04, 9 March 2024 diff hist +266 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →"There is also disagreement about whether the effect is real at all": Reply Tag: Reply
- 10:35 10:35, 9 March 2024 diff hist +370 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: Reply Tag: Reply
- 10:16 10:16, 9 March 2024 diff hist +107 Dunning–Kruger effect →Statistical: I'm still not happy with this wording, but it's a lot better
- 09:58 09:58, 9 March 2024 diff hist +5 m Dunning–Kruger effect →Statistical: should/could
- 09:57 09:57, 9 March 2024 diff hist +38 Dunning–Kruger effect More careful wording to stress that According to Jarry's Reporting/ summary of the situation is it fully debunked. (and that Gaze is a bit more nuanced: people's interpretation of the paper has been overbroad, but a narrow reading may still be correct. )
- 02:22 02:22, 9 March 2024 diff hist +8 m Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: <s></s>
- 02:19 02:19, 9 March 2024 diff hist +376 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: Reply Tag: Reply
- 02:15 02:15, 9 March 2024 diff hist −27 Dunning–Kruger effect →Statistical: I'm really not happy with this wording, but it does meet minimum requirements to be left in .. I *think*.
- 01:39 01:39, 9 March 2024 diff hist +223 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: sign again, since I've edited my comment based on updates
- 01:32 01:32, 9 March 2024 diff hist −24 Dunning–Kruger effect →Statistical: more npov wording/ (was slightly misleading)
- 01:32 01:32, 9 March 2024 diff hist −55 m Dunning–Kruger effect →Statistical: found 2 different references to same article
- 01:22 01:22, 9 March 2024 diff hist +70 Dunning–Kruger effect →Statistical
- 01:18 01:18, 9 March 2024 diff hist +200 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation
- 01:16 01:16, 9 March 2024 diff hist −89 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect re - sign with logged in
28 November 2023
- 05:39 05:39, 28 November 2023 diff hist +2 m Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: sp
- 05:39 05:39, 28 November 2023 diff hist +135 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: reword some more
- 05:23 05:23, 28 November 2023 diff hist +1 m Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation
- 05:22 05:22, 28 November 2023 diff hist −234 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: rewording to be closer to what the paper actually says.
- 05:14 05:14, 28 November 2023 diff hist +26 m Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: +ref
- 04:57 04:57, 28 November 2023 diff hist +680 User talk:Gwern →For some reason I'm discussing minutiae of Dunning-Kruger, and I blame you.: new section Tag: New topic
- 04:41 04:41, 28 November 2023 diff hist +531 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: replying to Constant314: Scientists often word things very carefully.
- 04:27 04:27, 28 November 2023 diff hist +368 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: Reply Tag: Reply
27 November 2023
- 13:23 13:23, 27 November 2023 diff hist 0 m Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation
- 13:20 13:20, 27 November 2023 diff hist +34 m Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation
- 13:18 13:18, 27 November 2023 diff hist +639 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: Reply Tag: Reply
- 13:06 13:06, 27 November 2023 diff hist +1,983 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: Reply Tag: Reply
- 11:48 11:48, 27 November 2023 diff hist +55 m Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation
- 11:46 11:46, 27 November 2023 diff hist −37 Dunning–Kruger effect And... read the papers through and found somewhat more careful wording. Tag: Reverted
- 11:41 11:41, 27 November 2023 diff hist −5 m Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation
- 11:40 11:40, 27 November 2023 diff hist +852 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: Annnd... just came back from reading papers
- 11:24 11:24, 27 November 2023 diff hist +643 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: Additional (possibly redundant) request for more detail here.
- 11:18 11:18, 27 November 2023 diff hist +1,023 Dunning–Kruger effect rv (1RR/BRD) Re-checking contents of each of the papers, I'm not entirely sure why refs were removed/reverted. I left a note on the talk page as well. I'd be interested to see what the explicit issues are (on the talk page) Tags: Manual revert Reverted harv-error
- 00:39 00:39, 27 November 2023 diff hist +1 m Dunning–Kruger effect + full stop Tag: Reverted
- 00:38 00:38, 27 November 2023 diff hist +22 m Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: + why I say that
- 00:37 00:37, 27 November 2023 diff hist +51 m Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation
- 00:35 00:35, 27 November 2023 diff hist −2 m Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation: better wording
- 00:34 00:34, 27 November 2023 diff hist +947 Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect →DK Effect is Simply Autocorrelation
- 00:25 00:25, 27 November 2023 diff hist +395 m Dunning–Kruger effect pp->loc add paper titles. Tag: Reverted
- 00:15 00:15, 27 November 2023 diff hist +233 Dunning–Kruger effect 2 more refs Tag: Reverted
- 00:06 00:06, 27 November 2023 diff hist −2 m Dunning–Kruger effect papers/authors Tag: Reverted
- 00:05 00:05, 27 November 2023 diff hist +396 Dunning–Kruger effect Adding Blair Fix position ... Blair Fix cites their sources. We already have Gignac here, but there's 2 more that I need to check before adding. see also Talk:Dunning–Kruger_effect#DK_Effect_is_Simply_Autocorrelation Tags: Reverted harv-error
8 November 2023
- 22:04 22:04, 8 November 2023 diff hist +585 User talk:Bawolff →How Wikipedia became the last good place on the internet: new section Tag: New topic