12:1612:16, 31 May 2020diffhist−69
King of Ruthenia
Ruthenia is a term used after conquest by Lithuania - to denote difference with Rosia. Galicia and Volhynia was not conquered from the beginning. So Ruthenia is not relevant. Wikipedia should not be used to support Russian propaganda about Russia as only heir to Rus', but should be unbiased
09:3709:37, 21 May 2020diffhist+509
Ukrainian language
This 'divergence' theory is outdated and has no citation. Also Polish influence on Ukrainian has nothing to do with Rus' time.
15:3215:32, 19 May 2020diffhist−89
West Polesian
Where did you get this idea? Any source? West Polessian is a dielect of Ukrainian on MAJORITY of ethnographic maps. Nowhere it is said that it is a transition betweek Ukrainian and Belorussian
20:5920:59, 29 January 2020diffhist+2
The Holocaust in Ukraine
Don't try to input 'Ukainian colloborators' everywhere - even when the text is about extermination policies of Nazi Germany on the occupied territories.
12:1612:16, 31 May 2020diffhist−69
King of Ruthenia
Ruthenia is a term used after conquest by Lithuania - to denote difference with Rosia. Galicia and Volhynia was not conquered from the beginning. So Ruthenia is not relevant. Wikipedia should not be used to support Russian propaganda about Russia as only heir to Rus', but should be unbiased
09:3709:37, 21 May 2020diffhist+509
Ukrainian language
This 'divergence' theory is outdated and has no citation. Also Polish influence on Ukrainian has nothing to do with Rus' time.
15:3215:32, 19 May 2020diffhist−89
West Polesian
Where did you get this idea? Any source? West Polessian is a dielect of Ukrainian on MAJORITY of ethnographic maps. Nowhere it is said that it is a transition betweek Ukrainian and Belorussian
20:5920:59, 29 January 2020diffhist+2
The Holocaust in Ukraine
Don't try to input 'Ukainian colloborators' everywhere - even when the text is about extermination policies of Nazi Germany on the occupied territories.