14:5914:59, 19 February 2021diffhist+149
BA 2100
Comment that neither proposed launch vehicle has ever flown, so they are hypothetical rather than actual options.
19:1819:18, 13 December 2020diffhist+108
The Guardian
Added reference to Grauniad.com being a real web address by which the paper satirises its own historical typographical errors.Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
08:0108:01, 3 June 2016diffhist+241
SCP Foundation
This is a re-revert of a good faith edit made previously and reverted by a bot - please do not revert it without a genuinely good reason
17:3817:38, 30 January 2014diffhist+774
Mick Jagger
Reverted good faith edits by Binksternet - added two verifiable and appropriate sources for this information. Salacious it may be, but it's verfiable and true.
14:2314:23, 22 October 2012diffhist−194
Mark 45 torpedo
Removed comment about typical kill radius destroying firing as well as target submarine - this is incompatible with known exposive yield and torpedo range.
14:5914:59, 19 February 2021diffhist+149
BA 2100
Comment that neither proposed launch vehicle has ever flown, so they are hypothetical rather than actual options.
19:1819:18, 13 December 2020diffhist+108
The Guardian
Added reference to Grauniad.com being a real web address by which the paper satirises its own historical typographical errors.Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
08:0108:01, 3 June 2016diffhist+241
SCP Foundation
This is a re-revert of a good faith edit made previously and reverted by a bot - please do not revert it without a genuinely good reason
17:3817:38, 30 January 2014diffhist+774
Mick Jagger
Reverted good faith edits by Binksternet - added two verifiable and appropriate sources for this information. Salacious it may be, but it's verfiable and true.
14:2314:23, 22 October 2012diffhist−194
Mark 45 torpedo
Removed comment about typical kill radius destroying firing as well as target submarine - this is incompatible with known exposive yield and torpedo range.