20:2320:23, 23 December 2016diffhist−7
Michael Sheen
Based on the clarification cited at the end of the article's introduction, it seems appropriate to remove "former" (at least for now).
17:0417:04, 7 August 2014diffhist+8
Schlieffen Plan
a single comma after "in it" is incorrect, but I've made the whole second clause clearer instead of just fixing the splice
20:2320:23, 23 December 2016diffhist−7
Michael Sheen
Based on the clarification cited at the end of the article's introduction, it seems appropriate to remove "former" (at least for now).
17:0417:04, 7 August 2014diffhist+8
Schlieffen Plan
a single comma after "in it" is incorrect, but I've made the whole second clause clearer instead of just fixing the splice