11:4111:41, 28 February 2024diffhist−339
Pim van Vliet
The page has been made more neutral following the Wikipedia guidelines. Any other suggestions are welcome to further improve this page. The intro and career sections provide more context. The book section is more concise and the 'also see' section is expanded.currentTags: COI template removedVisual edit
11:3611:36, 30 January 2024diffhist+678
Magic formula investing
Changed the sections headers. Also added a section with a critical study. Included reference to a study for the Indian markets which shows positive results. Included link to the French study. Also improved the spelling of Greenblatt's name (sometimes spelled with on t).Tag: Visual edit
13 December 2023
10:1310:13, 13 December 2023diffhist−486
Factor investing
Took out a double sentence and a double reference. Also changed the wording for the carry factor and referred to profitability (not CMA) as quality factor. Added some wiki-links to four common value metrics.Tag: Visual edit
09:1109:11, 15 August 2023diffhist−1,147
Pim van Vliet
The content of this page has been significantly improved by removing promotional content and several external links. Importantly, it is now written more from a neutral point of view.Tags: COI template removedVisual edit
22:2522:25, 8 August 2022diffhist+3,774
Conservative Formula Investing
The notability issue has been addressed. More external sources are added and many sentences are rewritten. Furthermore the formula was featured on Bloomberg.com and a independently replicated study for the Indian market. Furthermore a 'critique' section is added to give a more balanced description of the subject. The result section has also been rewritten and split in US results and International results.Tags: Visual editDisambiguation links added
17:2217:22, 12 July 2022diffhist+569
Pim van Vliet
Several sources are added to bring the article more in line with the notability guideline. Several reliable secondary sources are added such as the recent discussion of his research in the Washington Post. Also his role at Robeco is better described and linked to the company website. Furthermore the first sentence is rewritten in line with the guide and also the section on the career is rewritten with two additional secondary sources added.Tag: Visual edit
15 February 2022
16:0816:08, 15 February 2022diffhist−869
Conservative Formula Investing
The page has been rewritten to address the concerns with regards to notability, but also make it read less like a news coverage. The order of results and methodology has been changed. Mentioning of downloads is taken out. Furthermore, words like 'many' and 'beats' have been taken out to make the page more concise and factful.Tag: Visual edit
15:4115:41, 15 February 2022diffhist+718
N
Talk:Conservative Formula Investing
←Created page with '1 The Conservative Formula is a screen similar to the 'Magic Formula'. This is the sister page which has a similar setup: /info/en/?search=Magic_formula_investing 2 With regards to notability and news article: "The topic of this article may not meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline. (February 2022)" "This article reads like a press release or a news article and is largely based on routine coverage or sensationalism. (February 2022)"...'
7 February 2022
15:3315:33, 7 February 2022diffhist+810
Conservative Formula Investing
The page has been edited in several ways. First, the results are now also presented in a graphical way. Second, reference to SSRN top downloads is included. Third, the section 'analysis' has been rewritten and now also includes a reference towards an Indian application. Fourth, the related Piotroski F-score is added. Fifth, the three categories have been included to list with similar articles.Tag: Visual edit
11:4111:41, 28 February 2024diffhist−339
Pim van Vliet
The page has been made more neutral following the Wikipedia guidelines. Any other suggestions are welcome to further improve this page. The intro and career sections provide more context. The book section is more concise and the 'also see' section is expanded.currentTags: COI template removedVisual edit
11:3611:36, 30 January 2024diffhist+678
Magic formula investing
Changed the sections headers. Also added a section with a critical study. Included reference to a study for the Indian markets which shows positive results. Included link to the French study. Also improved the spelling of Greenblatt's name (sometimes spelled with on t).Tag: Visual edit
13 December 2023
10:1310:13, 13 December 2023diffhist−486
Factor investing
Took out a double sentence and a double reference. Also changed the wording for the carry factor and referred to profitability (not CMA) as quality factor. Added some wiki-links to four common value metrics.Tag: Visual edit
09:1109:11, 15 August 2023diffhist−1,147
Pim van Vliet
The content of this page has been significantly improved by removing promotional content and several external links. Importantly, it is now written more from a neutral point of view.Tags: COI template removedVisual edit
22:2522:25, 8 August 2022diffhist+3,774
Conservative Formula Investing
The notability issue has been addressed. More external sources are added and many sentences are rewritten. Furthermore the formula was featured on Bloomberg.com and a independently replicated study for the Indian market. Furthermore a 'critique' section is added to give a more balanced description of the subject. The result section has also been rewritten and split in US results and International results.Tags: Visual editDisambiguation links added
17:2217:22, 12 July 2022diffhist+569
Pim van Vliet
Several sources are added to bring the article more in line with the notability guideline. Several reliable secondary sources are added such as the recent discussion of his research in the Washington Post. Also his role at Robeco is better described and linked to the company website. Furthermore the first sentence is rewritten in line with the guide and also the section on the career is rewritten with two additional secondary sources added.Tag: Visual edit
15 February 2022
16:0816:08, 15 February 2022diffhist−869
Conservative Formula Investing
The page has been rewritten to address the concerns with regards to notability, but also make it read less like a news coverage. The order of results and methodology has been changed. Mentioning of downloads is taken out. Furthermore, words like 'many' and 'beats' have been taken out to make the page more concise and factful.Tag: Visual edit
15:4115:41, 15 February 2022diffhist+718
N
Talk:Conservative Formula Investing
←Created page with '1 The Conservative Formula is a screen similar to the 'Magic Formula'. This is the sister page which has a similar setup: /info/en/?search=Magic_formula_investing 2 With regards to notability and news article: "The topic of this article may not meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline. (February 2022)" "This article reads like a press release or a news article and is largely based on routine coverage or sensationalism. (February 2022)"...'
7 February 2022
15:3315:33, 7 February 2022diffhist+810
Conservative Formula Investing
The page has been edited in several ways. First, the results are now also presented in a graphical way. Second, reference to SSRN top downloads is included. Third, the section 'analysis' has been rewritten and now also includes a reference towards an Indian application. Fourth, the related Piotroski F-score is added. Fifth, the three categories have been included to list with similar articles.Tag: Visual edit