15:4615:46, 7 July 2024diffhist−941
Vega Expedition
I still fail to see how this was a skirmish, or why it needs a military conflict infobox; where's the evidence of the Swedes "firing upon the natives"? Is there any? I get the impression, from reading Sven's account, that the shot was fired into the air to restore order.current
16:0616:06, 20 June 2024diffhist−644
French invasion of Russia
Undid revision
1230087971 by
Aeengath (
talk) As far as I can tell (I don't read French) the Danish contingent remained in Hamburg and did not engage "directly in the land campaign in Russia" as was your earlier reasoning for removing the United Kingdom. If Denmark actually partook in the invasion, why don't you add it to the main body per
MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE?Tags: UndoReverted
11:2311:23, 20 June 2024diffhist−644
French invasion of Russia
I fail to see any mention of Denmark-Norway in the body of the article. If Denmark was indeed a belligerent and you decide to revert this edit, please also specify their role in the invasion.Tag: Reverted
01:0901:09, 19 June 2024diffhist+180
Siege of Wolgast
Interestingly, Jensen and Wimarson seem to disagree regarding the fate of the German-born Swedish soldiers [added Wimarson's version]; fixed the language in the lead [sva -> sv]; moved the alleged 820 losses to strength as, per the article, they were allowed free departure to the next Swedish garrison and were thus not a loss.
21:2821:28, 30 May 2024diffhist−348
Battle of Bornhöved (1813)
Reverting questionable edit: Firstly, don't remove sourced content without a good reason to do so; secondly, the infobox is supposed to represent the information in the article itself (and absolutely not conflict with it). Thirdly, if this is truly what your source says (128 dead Danish horses and 76 captured Swedes and not vice versa) and the error is not yours, it must be regarded as dubious since it is in dispute with most if not all other sources. You guys can do better.Tag: Manual revert
15:4615:46, 7 July 2024diffhist−941
Vega Expedition
I still fail to see how this was a skirmish, or why it needs a military conflict infobox; where's the evidence of the Swedes "firing upon the natives"? Is there any? I get the impression, from reading Sven's account, that the shot was fired into the air to restore order.current
16:0616:06, 20 June 2024diffhist−644
French invasion of Russia
Undid revision
1230087971 by
Aeengath (
talk) As far as I can tell (I don't read French) the Danish contingent remained in Hamburg and did not engage "directly in the land campaign in Russia" as was your earlier reasoning for removing the United Kingdom. If Denmark actually partook in the invasion, why don't you add it to the main body per
MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE?Tags: UndoReverted
11:2311:23, 20 June 2024diffhist−644
French invasion of Russia
I fail to see any mention of Denmark-Norway in the body of the article. If Denmark was indeed a belligerent and you decide to revert this edit, please also specify their role in the invasion.Tag: Reverted
01:0901:09, 19 June 2024diffhist+180
Siege of Wolgast
Interestingly, Jensen and Wimarson seem to disagree regarding the fate of the German-born Swedish soldiers [added Wimarson's version]; fixed the language in the lead [sva -> sv]; moved the alleged 820 losses to strength as, per the article, they were allowed free departure to the next Swedish garrison and were thus not a loss.
21:2821:28, 30 May 2024diffhist−348
Battle of Bornhöved (1813)
Reverting questionable edit: Firstly, don't remove sourced content without a good reason to do so; secondly, the infobox is supposed to represent the information in the article itself (and absolutely not conflict with it). Thirdly, if this is truly what your source says (128 dead Danish horses and 76 captured Swedes and not vice versa) and the error is not yours, it must be regarded as dubious since it is in dispute with most if not all other sources. You guys can do better.Tag: Manual revert