15:4915:49, 28 July 2013diffhist+252
Gospel of Luke
Removing misrepresentation of source and fixing the order of the sentences so as to avoid
WP:SYNTH. Also adding academic consensus according to Martin 2009 (35:13~22).
03:5703:57, 7 May 2013diffhist−10
Naginata
Nope. The way you have it worded, the implication is that this impression is modern (現代/post-WW2). If it goes back to the Edo Period (there appears to be only one source cited), then that is still not "modern".
02:4302:43, 6 May 2013diffhist+20
Tarsus, Mersin
Per Martin's Yale lectures, this is controversial among historians, as Paul's letters never make this claim, and Acts is something of an "enhanced history".
15:4915:49, 28 July 2013diffhist+252
Gospel of Luke
Removing misrepresentation of source and fixing the order of the sentences so as to avoid
WP:SYNTH. Also adding academic consensus according to Martin 2009 (35:13~22).
03:5703:57, 7 May 2013diffhist−10
Naginata
Nope. The way you have it worded, the implication is that this impression is modern (現代/post-WW2). If it goes back to the Edo Period (there appears to be only one source cited), then that is still not "modern".
02:4302:43, 6 May 2013diffhist+20
Tarsus, Mersin
Per Martin's Yale lectures, this is controversial among historians, as Paul's letters never make this claim, and Acts is something of an "enhanced history".