19:5419:54, 25 December 2023diffhist+362
m
Xiongnu invasion of Donghu
I tried to rewrite the article but kept some of the important information from the book Perilous Frontier because it analyzes the strategy of Modu Chanyu very well.
15:1815:18, 24 December 2023diffhist+6,129
N
Xiongnu invasion of Donghu
←Created page with '{{short description|Modu Chanyu's Campaign against Donghu Confederation in 206 BC}} {{Infobox military conflict | conflict = Xiongnu invasion of Donghu | date = 206 BC | place =
Inner Mongolia | result = Xiongnu victory *Donghu Confederation came under Xiongnu rule{{sfn|Barfield|1989|p=34}}{{sfn|Kim|2015|p=31}} | combatant1 =
Xiongnu | combatant2 =
Donghu Confederation | co...'Tag: Disambiguation links added
18:3618:36, 19 December 2023diffhist+502
Battle of Baideng
I am reverting because nobody answered on the talk page of this article, the people i am debating with is just avoiding the Book Published by Cambridge University Press and focusing on Lev Gumilev, if anyone disagrees, lets debate on the talk page of this articleTags: UndoReverted
17:3117:31, 11 December 2023diffhist+502
Battle of Baideng
User named HistoryofIran is refuting this argument without any proper knowledge while Lev Gumilev also explained why the Han China's army can be 320.000, i advise this user to check the sources i put and stop reverting the correct version.Tags: UndoReverted
17:2717:27, 11 December 2023diffhist−238
Battle of Baideng
The source used in the casualties part doesn't have any information about Xiongnu's casualties being heavy and Han casualties being less than Xiongnu.Tag: Reverted
17:0817:08, 11 December 2023diffhist+499
Battle of Baideng
I explained the reason why Xiongnu army wasn't 400.000, mentioned some of the sources that tells us it is an exaggeration and debunks it, but the user who changed it to 400.000 without letting me know it didn't reply, strength was already 20,000-40,000 before this user changed it, he told something with zero accurate explanations and i mentioned some of the sources that refuted this information, and it would be more accurate if it stays like the current version.Tags: UndoReverted
14:0214:02, 11 December 2023diffhist−1
Battle of Baideng
I basically reverted the edits of the user named Underbar dk, the number of the Hsiung-nu army was clearly an exaggeration of the old Chinese chronciles and Gumilev already debunked and refuted that information with a simple math calculation in his work.Tag: Reverted
19:5419:54, 25 December 2023diffhist+362
m
Xiongnu invasion of Donghu
I tried to rewrite the article but kept some of the important information from the book Perilous Frontier because it analyzes the strategy of Modu Chanyu very well.
15:1815:18, 24 December 2023diffhist+6,129
N
Xiongnu invasion of Donghu
←Created page with '{{short description|Modu Chanyu's Campaign against Donghu Confederation in 206 BC}} {{Infobox military conflict | conflict = Xiongnu invasion of Donghu | date = 206 BC | place =
Inner Mongolia | result = Xiongnu victory *Donghu Confederation came under Xiongnu rule{{sfn|Barfield|1989|p=34}}{{sfn|Kim|2015|p=31}} | combatant1 =
Xiongnu | combatant2 =
Donghu Confederation | co...'Tag: Disambiguation links added
18:3618:36, 19 December 2023diffhist+502
Battle of Baideng
I am reverting because nobody answered on the talk page of this article, the people i am debating with is just avoiding the Book Published by Cambridge University Press and focusing on Lev Gumilev, if anyone disagrees, lets debate on the talk page of this articleTags: UndoReverted
17:3117:31, 11 December 2023diffhist+502
Battle of Baideng
User named HistoryofIran is refuting this argument without any proper knowledge while Lev Gumilev also explained why the Han China's army can be 320.000, i advise this user to check the sources i put and stop reverting the correct version.Tags: UndoReverted
17:2717:27, 11 December 2023diffhist−238
Battle of Baideng
The source used in the casualties part doesn't have any information about Xiongnu's casualties being heavy and Han casualties being less than Xiongnu.Tag: Reverted
17:0817:08, 11 December 2023diffhist+499
Battle of Baideng
I explained the reason why Xiongnu army wasn't 400.000, mentioned some of the sources that tells us it is an exaggeration and debunks it, but the user who changed it to 400.000 without letting me know it didn't reply, strength was already 20,000-40,000 before this user changed it, he told something with zero accurate explanations and i mentioned some of the sources that refuted this information, and it would be more accurate if it stays like the current version.Tags: UndoReverted
14:0214:02, 11 December 2023diffhist−1
Battle of Baideng
I basically reverted the edits of the user named Underbar dk, the number of the Hsiung-nu army was clearly an exaggeration of the old Chinese chronciles and Gumilev already debunked and refuted that information with a simple math calculation in his work.Tag: Reverted