20:3620:36, 9 July 2024diffhist−4,774
Acratocnus simorhynchus
Merged into the main article. My reasoning for this is that the parent article gets relatively few views (only 15 a day, a day https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=1&range=latest-90&pages=Acratocnus ) and it makes more sense to cover all the species together in a single article which people are likely to readcurrentTag: New redirect
20:3420:34, 9 July 2024diffhist−5,744
Acratocnus antillensis
Merged into the main article. My reasoning for this is that the parent article gets relatively few views (only 15 a day, a day https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=1&range=latest-90&pages=Acratocnus ) and it makes more sense to cover all the species together in a single article which people are likely to readTag: Replaced
20:3120:31, 9 July 2024diffhist−5,143
Acratocnus ye
Merged into the main article. My reasoning for this is that the parent article gets relatively few views (only 15 a day, a day https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=1&range=latest-90&pages=Acratocnus ) and it makes more sense to cover all the species together in a single article which people are likely to readcurrentTags: New redirectVisual edit: Switched
20:3620:36, 9 July 2024diffhist−4,774
Acratocnus simorhynchus
Merged into the main article. My reasoning for this is that the parent article gets relatively few views (only 15 a day, a day https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=1&range=latest-90&pages=Acratocnus ) and it makes more sense to cover all the species together in a single article which people are likely to readcurrentTag: New redirect
20:3420:34, 9 July 2024diffhist−5,744
Acratocnus antillensis
Merged into the main article. My reasoning for this is that the parent article gets relatively few views (only 15 a day, a day https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=1&range=latest-90&pages=Acratocnus ) and it makes more sense to cover all the species together in a single article which people are likely to readTag: Replaced
20:3120:31, 9 July 2024diffhist−5,143
Acratocnus ye
Merged into the main article. My reasoning for this is that the parent article gets relatively few views (only 15 a day, a day https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=1&range=latest-90&pages=Acratocnus ) and it makes more sense to cover all the species together in a single article which people are likely to readcurrentTags: New redirectVisual edit: Switched