23:2123:21, 17 May 2007diffhist−149
Bosnian War
ok, we'll leave that for now. I was editing this before you made your edit. this makes it clearer. also, removed the dead link
23:0123:01, 17 May 2007diffhist+8
Bosnian War
that is not "common knowledge" by any stretch of the imagination. also, most "common knowledge" about wars is wrong/biased/controversial. so I'll ask you again to stop removing a sourced statement
22:0522:05, 17 May 2007diffhist+8
Bosnian War
I'm looking at the talk page...can't see anything by you on this issue...can't see any other source cited by you...all I see is you removing a sourced statement (which is considered vandalism)
19:5119:51, 17 May 2007diffhist+8
Bosnian War
well, neither of us were there. so all we have to go on are the sources. and this is what the sources say. may I suggest you read WP:V and Wikipedia:The Truth :-)
16:3416:34, 17 May 2007diffhist+56
Bosnia and Herzegovina
per NPOV and OR? what is biased about mentioning a fact. and you're using such a narrow definition of OR you'd probably consider rewriting something from a source OR
23:2123:21, 17 May 2007diffhist−149
Bosnian War
ok, we'll leave that for now. I was editing this before you made your edit. this makes it clearer. also, removed the dead link
23:0123:01, 17 May 2007diffhist+8
Bosnian War
that is not "common knowledge" by any stretch of the imagination. also, most "common knowledge" about wars is wrong/biased/controversial. so I'll ask you again to stop removing a sourced statement
22:0522:05, 17 May 2007diffhist+8
Bosnian War
I'm looking at the talk page...can't see anything by you on this issue...can't see any other source cited by you...all I see is you removing a sourced statement (which is considered vandalism)
19:5119:51, 17 May 2007diffhist+8
Bosnian War
well, neither of us were there. so all we have to go on are the sources. and this is what the sources say. may I suggest you read WP:V and Wikipedia:The Truth :-)
16:3416:34, 17 May 2007diffhist+56
Bosnia and Herzegovina
per NPOV and OR? what is biased about mentioning a fact. and you're using such a narrow definition of OR you'd probably consider rewriting something from a source OR