16:1216:12, 22 April 2008diffhist−245
Ayn Rand
→Charity: Once again, this is redundant, does not add anything to the discussion and references an irrelvant editorial from three years ago. Sorry, Cathy Young doesn't merit inclusion.
23:1323:13, 21 April 2008diffhist−245
Ayn Rand
It is not relevant to an already long and unwieldy biography. Try to stick into something other than Rand's biography, though I doubt it would qualify there either. Good luck,
23:0423:04, 21 April 2008diffhist−142
Naomi Oreskes
You are not being helpful William - you need to generate a consensus before changing things that we have had a previous consensus on. Relax and calm down.
22:4922:49, 21 April 2008diffhist+190
Naomi Oreskes
Undid - Please don't go around white washing the article. We were at least close to a consensus - your post is taking this in the wrong direction.
18:0618:06, 21 April 2008diffhist+33
Naomi Oreskes
Please don't make changes then argue "a consensus" when no such thing occurred. You should not be making these changes in the first place before discussing them. I have reverted to the original.
16:1216:12, 22 April 2008diffhist−245
Ayn Rand
→Charity: Once again, this is redundant, does not add anything to the discussion and references an irrelvant editorial from three years ago. Sorry, Cathy Young doesn't merit inclusion.
23:1323:13, 21 April 2008diffhist−245
Ayn Rand
It is not relevant to an already long and unwieldy biography. Try to stick into something other than Rand's biography, though I doubt it would qualify there either. Good luck,
23:0423:04, 21 April 2008diffhist−142
Naomi Oreskes
You are not being helpful William - you need to generate a consensus before changing things that we have had a previous consensus on. Relax and calm down.
22:4922:49, 21 April 2008diffhist+190
Naomi Oreskes
Undid - Please don't go around white washing the article. We were at least close to a consensus - your post is taking this in the wrong direction.
18:0618:06, 21 April 2008diffhist+33
Naomi Oreskes
Please don't make changes then argue "a consensus" when no such thing occurred. You should not be making these changes in the first place before discussing them. I have reverted to the original.