12:3412:34, 19 August 2009diffhist−595
Stormfront (website)
mass attribution, I'm challenging this edit because I think it should be attributed to the author rather than to "Others", but I can't change the sentence without reading the source.
WP:BURDEN
22:3622:36, 17 August 2009diffhist+2
Stormfront (website)
say or claim makes no difference. The sentence still is a mass attribution. If you want to include it, get the book find the quote and put it in. Otherwise it doesn't meet
WP:BURDEN
08:0608:06, 16 August 2009diffhist−614
Stormfront (website)
RS? Instead of saying "other's claim" say who is claiming what, and quote them accurately. It's pretty obvious POV pushing here again.
23:4723:47, 12 August 2009diffhist−83
Stormfront (website)
Let's see where my talk page leads? No.
WP:BURDEN let's see you justify using a quote that isn't supported by the article and then putting it under a POV title like "tactics".
12:3412:34, 19 August 2009diffhist−595
Stormfront (website)
mass attribution, I'm challenging this edit because I think it should be attributed to the author rather than to "Others", but I can't change the sentence without reading the source.
WP:BURDEN
22:3622:36, 17 August 2009diffhist+2
Stormfront (website)
say or claim makes no difference. The sentence still is a mass attribution. If you want to include it, get the book find the quote and put it in. Otherwise it doesn't meet
WP:BURDEN
08:0608:06, 16 August 2009diffhist−614
Stormfront (website)
RS? Instead of saying "other's claim" say who is claiming what, and quote them accurately. It's pretty obvious POV pushing here again.
23:4723:47, 12 August 2009diffhist−83
Stormfront (website)
Let's see where my talk page leads? No.
WP:BURDEN let's see you justify using a quote that isn't supported by the article and then putting it under a POV title like "tactics".