21:5821:58, 3 March 2023diffhist+37
Wojciech Bogusławski
Noticing that the commemorating stamp doesn't really belong to the section "Death", I have started a new section, "Afterlife", with the stamp and the novel by Spiró.
12:4112:41, 9 February 2022diffhist0
Gaussian free field
Undid revision 1029262903 by
Vacuum Bubble (
talk) No, I was not confused. 1 time and d space dimension would be just Brownian motion in d-dimensional space, a random continuous map from [0,\infty) to \R^d. While d-dimensional GFF is a random (generalized) function from \R^d to \R.Tag: Undo
23:1523:15, 5 November 2018diffhist+27
David X. Li
→CDOs and Gaussian copula: The Wired article had an explanation added: "because history is not predictive of the future". This I think is false, but even it was correct, it would have nothing to do with using Gaussian copulas for everything. Hence I deleted this sentence and its repetition from the next paragraph, changing it to something meaningful.
21:5821:58, 3 March 2023diffhist+37
Wojciech Bogusławski
Noticing that the commemorating stamp doesn't really belong to the section "Death", I have started a new section, "Afterlife", with the stamp and the novel by Spiró.
12:4112:41, 9 February 2022diffhist0
Gaussian free field
Undid revision 1029262903 by
Vacuum Bubble (
talk) No, I was not confused. 1 time and d space dimension would be just Brownian motion in d-dimensional space, a random continuous map from [0,\infty) to \R^d. While d-dimensional GFF is a random (generalized) function from \R^d to \R.Tag: Undo
23:1523:15, 5 November 2018diffhist+27
David X. Li
→CDOs and Gaussian copula: The Wired article had an explanation added: "because history is not predictive of the future". This I think is false, but even it was correct, it would have nothing to do with using Gaussian copulas for everything. Hence I deleted this sentence and its repetition from the next paragraph, changing it to something meaningful.