13:1713:17, 30 November 2010diffhist−225
Sarissa
I don't think that those comments have anything to add nor do they really embellish the style of the article
13:3813:38, 29 September 2010diffhist+55
Ancient Macedonians
Reverted 2 edits by
94.65.251.23; ?the same thing in other words. Yet, it is logical to first present the major theory. Can you take part in the discussion? Don't you like the wording as is?. (
TW)
13:0613:06, 28 September 2010diffhist+36
Ancient Macedonians
wrong conclusion, if you want to take part in the discussion. "doric" is one sub-theory (and not even a prevalent one) of the "they were Greek" theory
13:1713:17, 30 November 2010diffhist−225
Sarissa
I don't think that those comments have anything to add nor do they really embellish the style of the article
13:3813:38, 29 September 2010diffhist+55
Ancient Macedonians
Reverted 2 edits by
94.65.251.23; ?the same thing in other words. Yet, it is logical to first present the major theory. Can you take part in the discussion? Don't you like the wording as is?. (
TW)
13:0613:06, 28 September 2010diffhist+36
Ancient Macedonians
wrong conclusion, if you want to take part in the discussion. "doric" is one sub-theory (and not even a prevalent one) of the "they were Greek" theory