21:0421:04, 26 September 2016diffhist−1,507
Lee Zeldin
Restored this version. If you look at the diff, you'll note most of the "deletions" are actually re-orderings of content. The only things deleted have been lengthy explanations of bills in cases where the article links to wikipedia pages on those bills.
18:5018:50, 24 September 2016diffhist−233
John Katko
Including the language "gruesome and illegal", though investigations have proven otherwise, is a form of "weasel words". If this language is to be kept, either that should be noted, or we should have a neutral characterization of Katko's statement.
15:5015:50, 24 September 2016diffhist−95
Morgan Carroll
Surely it's understood that a claim by a politician automatically has POV. Claims by politicians are largely made in press releases, so this is redundant.
15:4515:45, 24 September 2016diffhist−108
John Katko
"Gruesome and illegal" is plainly POV, as the wikipedia article on the PP videos controversy clearly states that no wrongdoing was found on the part of PP, and that the folks who secretly tool the video were indicted.
21:0421:04, 26 September 2016diffhist−1,507
Lee Zeldin
Restored this version. If you look at the diff, you'll note most of the "deletions" are actually re-orderings of content. The only things deleted have been lengthy explanations of bills in cases where the article links to wikipedia pages on those bills.
18:5018:50, 24 September 2016diffhist−233
John Katko
Including the language "gruesome and illegal", though investigations have proven otherwise, is a form of "weasel words". If this language is to be kept, either that should be noted, or we should have a neutral characterization of Katko's statement.
15:5015:50, 24 September 2016diffhist−95
Morgan Carroll
Surely it's understood that a claim by a politician automatically has POV. Claims by politicians are largely made in press releases, so this is redundant.
15:4515:45, 24 September 2016diffhist−108
John Katko
"Gruesome and illegal" is plainly POV, as the wikipedia article on the PP videos controversy clearly states that no wrongdoing was found on the part of PP, and that the folks who secretly tool the video were indicted.