19:1019:10, 12 December 2022diffhist+23
The Undertaker
→Rebirthed Deadman (1994–1996): Changed the inadvertent hitting of the Undertaker by Paul Bearer with the urn to deliberate. Not only did Bearer turn on Taker during the match, but he then particpated in a beat down along with Mankind of the Undertaker. There is no way that could be considered inadvertentTag: Reverted
15:5915:59, 13 September 2014diffhist+8
Rightscorp
→Services: Added "alleged" before "downloader." The language made it seem like liability could automatically be established simply by sending settlement notices where it in actuality has to be proven in a civil court.
15:5715:57, 13 September 2014diffhist−250
Rightscorp
→Services: Removed Christopher Sabec's opinion on virtual private network because it seemed unnecessary that his opinion is listed under services for the company.
15:5415:54, 13 September 2014diffhist+233
Rightscorp
→Services: This line made it seem like the receiver of the notice is automatically liable so I made it clear that liability has to be decided by the courts.
12:5712:57, 2 June 2014diffhist+885
Rightscorp
Undid revision 611182859 by
Stlrbrt (
talk)Restored information that was erroneously labeled as vandalism and verified by a third party as not being vandalism.
19:1019:10, 12 December 2022diffhist+23
The Undertaker
→Rebirthed Deadman (1994–1996): Changed the inadvertent hitting of the Undertaker by Paul Bearer with the urn to deliberate. Not only did Bearer turn on Taker during the match, but he then particpated in a beat down along with Mankind of the Undertaker. There is no way that could be considered inadvertentTag: Reverted
15:5915:59, 13 September 2014diffhist+8
Rightscorp
→Services: Added "alleged" before "downloader." The language made it seem like liability could automatically be established simply by sending settlement notices where it in actuality has to be proven in a civil court.
15:5715:57, 13 September 2014diffhist−250
Rightscorp
→Services: Removed Christopher Sabec's opinion on virtual private network because it seemed unnecessary that his opinion is listed under services for the company.
15:5415:54, 13 September 2014diffhist+233
Rightscorp
→Services: This line made it seem like the receiver of the notice is automatically liable so I made it clear that liability has to be decided by the courts.
12:5712:57, 2 June 2014diffhist+885
Rightscorp
Undid revision 611182859 by
Stlrbrt (
talk)Restored information that was erroneously labeled as vandalism and verified by a third party as not being vandalism.