21:0721:07, 5 January 2021diffhist−9
Caste: The Origins of Our Discontents
Undid revision 998536494 by
Footlessmouse (
talk) Actually, NM, I will work elsewhere. This could be a
WP:GA if the content section were replaced with a new one based on the reviews and some of the review statements expanded. It is an important book and will win more awards in the coming monthsTag: Undo
20:5420:54, 5 January 2021diffhist+9
Caste: The Origins of Our Discontents
Undid revision 998527790 by
Sandstein (
talk) That can only be true if the book summaries its own content. This summary is from a WP editor and is not represented in reliable source, of which there are many. It is UNDUE giving weight to what one editor believes the book is about rather than using what sources say. A proper content section can be made using all the source, such as the New York Times.Tags: UndoReverted
19:3719:37, 5 January 2021diffhist+8
Caste: The Origins of Our Discontents
Comment out entirety of the Content section: Given UNDUE weight to information not represented in RS. (Hence the primary source banner that was somewhat improperly removed). Note also, about previous removal of content: the book's commercial success is discussed more by the sources than any other single aspect of book, it was hardly undue, as undue is determined soley by what the sources have to sayTag: 2017 wikitext editor
21:0721:07, 5 January 2021diffhist−9
Caste: The Origins of Our Discontents
Undid revision 998536494 by
Footlessmouse (
talk) Actually, NM, I will work elsewhere. This could be a
WP:GA if the content section were replaced with a new one based on the reviews and some of the review statements expanded. It is an important book and will win more awards in the coming monthsTag: Undo
20:5420:54, 5 January 2021diffhist+9
Caste: The Origins of Our Discontents
Undid revision 998527790 by
Sandstein (
talk) That can only be true if the book summaries its own content. This summary is from a WP editor and is not represented in reliable source, of which there are many. It is UNDUE giving weight to what one editor believes the book is about rather than using what sources say. A proper content section can be made using all the source, such as the New York Times.Tags: UndoReverted
19:3719:37, 5 January 2021diffhist+8
Caste: The Origins of Our Discontents
Comment out entirety of the Content section: Given UNDUE weight to information not represented in RS. (Hence the primary source banner that was somewhat improperly removed). Note also, about previous removal of content: the book's commercial success is discussed more by the sources than any other single aspect of book, it was hardly undue, as undue is determined soley by what the sources have to sayTag: 2017 wikitext editor