04:0404:04, 14 May 2014diffhist+1,293
New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures
Removed Walter Martin as a reference for substantiating who the translators were. This reference only proves who Walter believed they were. Mr. Martin does not provide one name in his book of anyone that provided him this information. It not credible.
04:0304:03, 14 May 2014diffhist−1,293
New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures
Removed Walter Martin as a reference for substantiating who the translators were. This reference only proves who Walter believed they were. Mr. Martin does not provide one name in his book of anyone that provided him this information. It not credible.
03:3103:31, 14 May 2014diffhist0
New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures
BeDuhns review is hardly neutral.BeDuhn reported that the ''New World Translation'' was "not bias free", but emerged "as the most accurate of the translations compared", and thus a "remarkably good translation".
05:3305:33, 12 May 2014diffhist−27
m
New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures
Many of the critical reviews "for" and "against" the NWT were placed next to one another which made it hard to read and subsequently understand. By creating a "for" and "against" section, the merits of each argument more clearly stand out.
05:0105:01, 12 May 2014diffhist−458
New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures
The reference does not suitably substantiate the point being made. The reference states that he supervised the team, but the statement that was being substantiated was that all of the identities were known.
04:0404:04, 14 May 2014diffhist+1,293
New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures
Removed Walter Martin as a reference for substantiating who the translators were. This reference only proves who Walter believed they were. Mr. Martin does not provide one name in his book of anyone that provided him this information. It not credible.
04:0304:03, 14 May 2014diffhist−1,293
New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures
Removed Walter Martin as a reference for substantiating who the translators were. This reference only proves who Walter believed they were. Mr. Martin does not provide one name in his book of anyone that provided him this information. It not credible.
03:3103:31, 14 May 2014diffhist0
New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures
BeDuhns review is hardly neutral.BeDuhn reported that the ''New World Translation'' was "not bias free", but emerged "as the most accurate of the translations compared", and thus a "remarkably good translation".
05:3305:33, 12 May 2014diffhist−27
m
New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures
Many of the critical reviews "for" and "against" the NWT were placed next to one another which made it hard to read and subsequently understand. By creating a "for" and "against" section, the merits of each argument more clearly stand out.
05:0105:01, 12 May 2014diffhist−458
New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures
The reference does not suitably substantiate the point being made. The reference states that he supervised the team, but the statement that was being substantiated was that all of the identities were known.