09:1709:17, 9 June 2024diffhist−216
Android 15
If you want to include some fictional characters tangentially related (thematically) at best, there already is a disambiguation page. The dragon ball characters are not uniquely named, they are enumerated just like Android versions, and I bet you that Dragon Ball is not the only arts and culture piece that enumerated robot/Android characters. Personally, I even question the relevancy of making a new page for every individual Android version instead of just one detailed page. Disambiguation pa...Tags: Mobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile editDisambiguation links added
16:2316:23, 11 July 2022diffhist+759
N
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Napoleon's penis
←Created page with 'This article appears to only regurgitate (a) rumor(s), without going in on why it is relevant (WP:RELEVANCE) or why it might be true or false. It also appears to have an uncritical or biased view: The sources are exclusively newspapers who do the same thing: regurgitate one another. It has no scolarly sources giving this article the slightest flair of encyclopedic content. The true/falsehood of this rumor (which would be discussed in serious scolarly sou...'Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
09:1709:17, 9 June 2024diffhist−216
Android 15
If you want to include some fictional characters tangentially related (thematically) at best, there already is a disambiguation page. The dragon ball characters are not uniquely named, they are enumerated just like Android versions, and I bet you that Dragon Ball is not the only arts and culture piece that enumerated robot/Android characters. Personally, I even question the relevancy of making a new page for every individual Android version instead of just one detailed page. Disambiguation pa...Tags: Mobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile editDisambiguation links added
16:2316:23, 11 July 2022diffhist+759
N
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Napoleon's penis
←Created page with 'This article appears to only regurgitate (a) rumor(s), without going in on why it is relevant (WP:RELEVANCE) or why it might be true or false. It also appears to have an uncritical or biased view: The sources are exclusively newspapers who do the same thing: regurgitate one another. It has no scolarly sources giving this article the slightest flair of encyclopedic content. The true/falsehood of this rumor (which would be discussed in serious scolarly sou...'Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit