14:5914:59, 30 July 2007diffhist+2
Network (1976 film)
There are lots of things his speech incorporates, so rather than try to sum them up according to editor preferance, I've used the words of the film itself
23:3923:39, 17 June 2007diffhist−6
Anarcho-capitalism
These sources are valid, if you have any problem with an individual source bring it up on talk, removing them all on a whim is totally out of bounds
15:3915:39, 7 June 2007diffhist−182
Crypto-anarchy
I reverted because infinityO's version was less POV mongering, not because of the well founded assumption that you are a sockpuppet or the demostrated fact that you are a meatpuppet
15:3715:37, 7 June 2007diffhist−26,774
Anarchism and anarcho-capitalism
That you are a sockpuppet is a well founded assumption, that you are a meatpuppet is a demonstrated fact. But I'm reverting now because infinity's version is better justified in talk
15:2815:28, 7 June 2007diffhist−268
Anarcho-capitalism
Uh huh. You had already divided the pro-capitalist section into two parts to overload it with sources, the fact that I did the same is balanced. Three sections just makes it an arms race
15:0315:03, 7 June 2007diffhist−268
Anarcho-capitalism
This source did not fail verification until you apply the standard across the board. Creating a new category everytime one of your sources doesn't say what you want it to does not a good article make
13:3213:32, 7 June 2007diffhist+960
Talk:Anarchism
Turns out that informing wiki editors about the presence of a meat puppet is harassment, oh well, that doesn't justify reverting the entire thing
11:5611:56, 7 June 2007diffhist+571
Talk:Anarcho-capitalism
Apparently my entire comment was worthy of reversion, nonetheless, I'm going to go out on a limb and restore the content part that Vass didn't have time to bother with
14:5914:59, 30 July 2007diffhist+2
Network (1976 film)
There are lots of things his speech incorporates, so rather than try to sum them up according to editor preferance, I've used the words of the film itself
23:3923:39, 17 June 2007diffhist−6
Anarcho-capitalism
These sources are valid, if you have any problem with an individual source bring it up on talk, removing them all on a whim is totally out of bounds
15:3915:39, 7 June 2007diffhist−182
Crypto-anarchy
I reverted because infinityO's version was less POV mongering, not because of the well founded assumption that you are a sockpuppet or the demostrated fact that you are a meatpuppet
15:3715:37, 7 June 2007diffhist−26,774
Anarchism and anarcho-capitalism
That you are a sockpuppet is a well founded assumption, that you are a meatpuppet is a demonstrated fact. But I'm reverting now because infinity's version is better justified in talk
15:2815:28, 7 June 2007diffhist−268
Anarcho-capitalism
Uh huh. You had already divided the pro-capitalist section into two parts to overload it with sources, the fact that I did the same is balanced. Three sections just makes it an arms race
15:0315:03, 7 June 2007diffhist−268
Anarcho-capitalism
This source did not fail verification until you apply the standard across the board. Creating a new category everytime one of your sources doesn't say what you want it to does not a good article make
13:3213:32, 7 June 2007diffhist+960
Talk:Anarchism
Turns out that informing wiki editors about the presence of a meat puppet is harassment, oh well, that doesn't justify reverting the entire thing
11:5611:56, 7 June 2007diffhist+571
Talk:Anarcho-capitalism
Apparently my entire comment was worthy of reversion, nonetheless, I'm going to go out on a limb and restore the content part that Vass didn't have time to bother with