17:5017:50, 1 December 2021diffhist−123
Éric Zemmour
Undid revision 1058134291 by
JBchrch (
talk) I disagree. This is not consensus. And breaching previous consensus built with others. Such a change must be discussed in the talk page. Create a new paragraph in talk page and propose wording as you see fit, and let other propose too.Tags: UndoReverted
17:3117:31, 1 December 2021diffhist−154
Éric Zemmour
Undid revision 1058131006 by
Hemiauchenia (
talk) What is disruptive is that changes have been made in the last 12/24 hours (including by you) without mere discussion in the talk page, destroying previous consensus. of course, candidacy should be included, and I have only restored until this change, which should indeed appear. Anything else after should be built on consensus. Please see talk page.Tags: UndoReverted
17:0617:06, 1 December 2021diffhist−221
Éric Zemmour
Restoring previous consensus version of this paragraph. Discuss any potential change in talk page BEFORE amending the leadTag: Reverted
16:5716:57, 1 December 2021diffhist+76
Éric Zemmour
Restoring previous consensus version of this paragraph. Discuss any potential change in talk page BEFORE amending the leadTag: Reverted
16:3916:39, 1 December 2021diffhist+237
Talk:Éric Zemmour
→Candidacy in lead: Creation of a "lead section", with paragraphs on various issues: Please discuss here all proposed changes in the lead, in order to build consensus, BEFORE making any change in the lead.
16:2816:28, 1 December 2021diffhist−124
Éric Zemmour
Restored consensus version of lead for § 1 just before inclusion on declaration of candidacy, which is factual and can be indeed added. But No reason at all that the at length previously debated lead should be changed/disorganized drastically motu proprio based on individual undebated thoughts such as :«Changed lead to tone down what I perceived to be a promotional tone in favor of Zemmour" or «Think this is better ». Go to talk page & discuss proposed changes BEFORE any change in lead.
17:5017:50, 1 December 2021diffhist−123
Éric Zemmour
Undid revision 1058134291 by
JBchrch (
talk) I disagree. This is not consensus. And breaching previous consensus built with others. Such a change must be discussed in the talk page. Create a new paragraph in talk page and propose wording as you see fit, and let other propose too.Tags: UndoReverted
17:3117:31, 1 December 2021diffhist−154
Éric Zemmour
Undid revision 1058131006 by
Hemiauchenia (
talk) What is disruptive is that changes have been made in the last 12/24 hours (including by you) without mere discussion in the talk page, destroying previous consensus. of course, candidacy should be included, and I have only restored until this change, which should indeed appear. Anything else after should be built on consensus. Please see talk page.Tags: UndoReverted
17:0617:06, 1 December 2021diffhist−221
Éric Zemmour
Restoring previous consensus version of this paragraph. Discuss any potential change in talk page BEFORE amending the leadTag: Reverted
16:5716:57, 1 December 2021diffhist+76
Éric Zemmour
Restoring previous consensus version of this paragraph. Discuss any potential change in talk page BEFORE amending the leadTag: Reverted
16:3916:39, 1 December 2021diffhist+237
Talk:Éric Zemmour
→Candidacy in lead: Creation of a "lead section", with paragraphs on various issues: Please discuss here all proposed changes in the lead, in order to build consensus, BEFORE making any change in the lead.
16:2816:28, 1 December 2021diffhist−124
Éric Zemmour
Restored consensus version of lead for § 1 just before inclusion on declaration of candidacy, which is factual and can be indeed added. But No reason at all that the at length previously debated lead should be changed/disorganized drastically motu proprio based on individual undebated thoughts such as :«Changed lead to tone down what I perceived to be a promotional tone in favor of Zemmour" or «Think this is better ». Go to talk page & discuss proposed changes BEFORE any change in lead.