14:0514:05, 31 January 2021diffhist+2,208
Anima Anandkumar
Undid revision 1003953462 by
Tunkki-1970 (
talk) Content does not violate BLP policies in any way. Please show precisely how policy is violated if you disagree. There is nothing stated that is false. Topic is of relevance.Tags: UndoReverted
13:4713:47, 31 January 2021diffhist+2,189
Anima Anandkumar
Undid revision 1003945386 by
Tunkki-1970 (
talk) Don't remove section until the consensus in the talk page supports your position. The default is to keep content unless there is a good reason to remove it.Tags: UndoReverted
12:3712:37, 31 January 2021diffhist+2,189
Anima Anandkumar
Undid revision 1003938552 by
Tunkki-1970 (
talk Prev. edit misunderstands NPOV and general policy. The source merely has to be reliable and support the wiki text. The wiki must and should be NPOV, but sources will have varying quality. (If only NPOV sources were allowed, Wikipedia could never have biographies.) The text you are deleting is stating uncontroversial facts. Please refrain from deleting content you don't like.)Tag: Reverted
11:1311:13, 31 January 2021diffhist+2,190
Anima Anandkumar
Undid revision 1003353218 by
Tunkki-1970 (
talk) Removing content for spurious accusations of bias in sources should be frowned upon. Nobody disputes the reality of this controversy, or its impact in the field.Tags: UndoReverted
20:4720:47, 21 January 2018diffhist+105
N
User:ElPikacupacabra
←Created page with 'I sometimes: 1. edit minor mistakes I find; 2. note a lack of references; 3. mark obvious contradictions.'current
04:4904:49, 12 February 2012diffhist−457
Niall Ferguson
→World War I: The observation deleted was wrong. The passage referenced was clearly ironic. Either way, this is not the place for politically induced statements of what "impressions" Niall Ferguson leaves.
14:0514:05, 31 January 2021diffhist+2,208
Anima Anandkumar
Undid revision 1003953462 by
Tunkki-1970 (
talk) Content does not violate BLP policies in any way. Please show precisely how policy is violated if you disagree. There is nothing stated that is false. Topic is of relevance.Tags: UndoReverted
13:4713:47, 31 January 2021diffhist+2,189
Anima Anandkumar
Undid revision 1003945386 by
Tunkki-1970 (
talk) Don't remove section until the consensus in the talk page supports your position. The default is to keep content unless there is a good reason to remove it.Tags: UndoReverted
12:3712:37, 31 January 2021diffhist+2,189
Anima Anandkumar
Undid revision 1003938552 by
Tunkki-1970 (
talk Prev. edit misunderstands NPOV and general policy. The source merely has to be reliable and support the wiki text. The wiki must and should be NPOV, but sources will have varying quality. (If only NPOV sources were allowed, Wikipedia could never have biographies.) The text you are deleting is stating uncontroversial facts. Please refrain from deleting content you don't like.)Tag: Reverted
11:1311:13, 31 January 2021diffhist+2,190
Anima Anandkumar
Undid revision 1003353218 by
Tunkki-1970 (
talk) Removing content for spurious accusations of bias in sources should be frowned upon. Nobody disputes the reality of this controversy, or its impact in the field.Tags: UndoReverted
20:4720:47, 21 January 2018diffhist+105
N
User:ElPikacupacabra
←Created page with 'I sometimes: 1. edit minor mistakes I find; 2. note a lack of references; 3. mark obvious contradictions.'current
04:4904:49, 12 February 2012diffhist−457
Niall Ferguson
→World War I: The observation deleted was wrong. The passage referenced was clearly ironic. Either way, this is not the place for politically induced statements of what "impressions" Niall Ferguson leaves.