20:3220:32, 25 April 2020diffhist0
m
Sanjay Shah
Eagleeye321 moved page
Sanjay Shah to
Danish Tax Scandal: This article is almost entirely about the Danish Dividend Tax Scandal and the subject is only notable for this reason. Disclaimer: conflict of interest. I represent the subject.
20:2920:29, 25 April 2020diffhist+1,042
Sanjay Shah
Added recent press article. Disclaimer: conflict of interest. I represent the subject.Tag: possible
BLP issue or vandalism
24 April 2020
11:5111:51, 24 April 2020diffhist+1,455
Sanjay Shah
Add media articles. Disclaimer: Conflict of interest. I represent the subject.Tag: possible
BLP issue or vandalism
12:1712:17, 21 April 2020diffhist−74
Sanjay Shah
No such comment about extradition made in the article. Disclaimer: conflict of interest. I represent the subject.
10:4310:43, 21 April 2020diffhist−376
Sanjay Shah
News references are old and out of date and no longer valid. Disclaimer: conflict of interest. I represent the subject.
10:4210:42, 21 April 2020diffhist−2,319
Sanjay Shah
News references are old and out of date and no longer valid. Disclaimer: conflict of interest. I represent the subject.
20 April 2020
09:2809:28, 20 April 2020diffhist+2
m
Sanjay Shah
Mistranslation of Danish language into English. Disclaimer: conflict of interest. I represent the subject.
19 April 2020
16:2216:22, 19 April 2020diffhist+20
Sanjay Shah
The Danish word for "seized" needs to be clarified as "frozen but not confiscated" to differentiate from "confiscated". Disclaimer: conflict of interest, I represent the subject.
16:1616:16, 19 April 2020diffhist−366
Sanjay Shah
The quote removed refers to two companies/defendants not legally associated with the subject. (Disclaimer: conflict of interest, I represent the subject.)
08:1608:16, 17 November 2019diffhist+1
Sanjay Shah
→Tax fraud indictment: There is no indictment and no reference to any indictment. I am conflicted as I work for the subject. The article referred to says: It is now clear, after the Danish and British authorities have agreed on an agreement on where the British financier should be prosecuted if necessary.
11:2611:26, 9 October 2019diffhist+12
Sanjay Shah
→Tax fraud: I've added the word "allegations" as these are only allegations and no fraud has been proven in any jurisdiction. Note that I am conflicted as I work for the subject of this page.
06:3506:35, 15 July 2019diffhist−287
Sanjay Shah
New York Times articles does not mention any amounts frozen or seized by the UAE authorities.Tag: references removed
20:3220:32, 25 April 2020diffhist0
m
Sanjay Shah
Eagleeye321 moved page
Sanjay Shah to
Danish Tax Scandal: This article is almost entirely about the Danish Dividend Tax Scandal and the subject is only notable for this reason. Disclaimer: conflict of interest. I represent the subject.
20:2920:29, 25 April 2020diffhist+1,042
Sanjay Shah
Added recent press article. Disclaimer: conflict of interest. I represent the subject.Tag: possible
BLP issue or vandalism
24 April 2020
11:5111:51, 24 April 2020diffhist+1,455
Sanjay Shah
Add media articles. Disclaimer: Conflict of interest. I represent the subject.Tag: possible
BLP issue or vandalism
12:1712:17, 21 April 2020diffhist−74
Sanjay Shah
No such comment about extradition made in the article. Disclaimer: conflict of interest. I represent the subject.
10:4310:43, 21 April 2020diffhist−376
Sanjay Shah
News references are old and out of date and no longer valid. Disclaimer: conflict of interest. I represent the subject.
10:4210:42, 21 April 2020diffhist−2,319
Sanjay Shah
News references are old and out of date and no longer valid. Disclaimer: conflict of interest. I represent the subject.
20 April 2020
09:2809:28, 20 April 2020diffhist+2
m
Sanjay Shah
Mistranslation of Danish language into English. Disclaimer: conflict of interest. I represent the subject.
19 April 2020
16:2216:22, 19 April 2020diffhist+20
Sanjay Shah
The Danish word for "seized" needs to be clarified as "frozen but not confiscated" to differentiate from "confiscated". Disclaimer: conflict of interest, I represent the subject.
16:1616:16, 19 April 2020diffhist−366
Sanjay Shah
The quote removed refers to two companies/defendants not legally associated with the subject. (Disclaimer: conflict of interest, I represent the subject.)
08:1608:16, 17 November 2019diffhist+1
Sanjay Shah
→Tax fraud indictment: There is no indictment and no reference to any indictment. I am conflicted as I work for the subject. The article referred to says: It is now clear, after the Danish and British authorities have agreed on an agreement on where the British financier should be prosecuted if necessary.
11:2611:26, 9 October 2019diffhist+12
Sanjay Shah
→Tax fraud: I've added the word "allegations" as these are only allegations and no fraud has been proven in any jurisdiction. Note that I am conflicted as I work for the subject of this page.
06:3506:35, 15 July 2019diffhist−287
Sanjay Shah
New York Times articles does not mention any amounts frozen or seized by the UAE authorities.Tag: references removed