A user with 42 edits. Account created on 25 May 2024.
29 June 2024
- 17:01 17:01, 29 June 2024 diff hist +611 Talk:Tornado records →Never observed 300+ mph wind tornadoes: Reply Tag: Reply
- 16:59 16:59, 29 June 2024 diff hist −4,394 Tornado records Information incorrect, sources are old and these tornadoes were in a time where accurate measurements were not available any subsequent estimations are just subjective and by no means worthy of a mention. Please don't go filling people's heads with the idea that a tornado from 1764 was potentially 300 mph when there is zero way one can verify it. Tags: Undo Reverted
- 16:10 16:10, 29 June 2024 diff hist −4,394 Tornado records No edit summary Tag: Reverted
24 June 2024
- 23:10 23:10, 24 June 2024 diff hist +234 Talk:Tornado records →Verification Check: Highest winds observed in a tornado: Reply Tag: Reply
- 22:52 22:52, 24 June 2024 diff hist +148 Talk:Tornado records →Verification Check: Highest winds observed in a tornado: Reply Tag: Reply
- 22:48 22:48, 24 June 2024 diff hist +808 Talk:Tornado records →Verification Check: Highest winds observed in a tornado: Reply Tag: Reply
- 22:40 22:40, 24 June 2024 diff hist +381 Talk:Tornado records →Verification Check: Highest winds observed in a tornado: Reply Tag: Reply
- 22:38 22:38, 24 June 2024 diff hist +503 Talk:Tornado records →Verification Check: Highest winds observed in a tornado: Reply Tag: Reply
- 22:35 22:35, 24 June 2024 diff hist +501 User talk:Dovah12333 →Discussion on Tornado Records: Reply Tag: Reply
- 22:33 22:33, 24 June 2024 diff hist −2,463 Tornado records Fujita messed up Xenia thinking it was F6 originally even when it can barely get EF4 today, there is no actual backing to a 300 rating for ANY of these tornadoes that is objective and scientific, therefore speculation will not be tolerated. I can't believe I even have to say this but, use your common sense. Tags: Undo Reverted
- 22:25 22:25, 24 June 2024 diff hist −2,463 Tornado records Stop trying to spread information that cannot be testified thank you. Unless you can provide evidence as to why 300 mph should be deserved other than the subjective opinion of individuals like Grazulis then you cannot pass it off as fact. Tags: Undo Reverted
- 22:19 22:19, 24 June 2024 diff hist −2,463 Tornado records Undid revision 1230820860 by Dovah12333 ( talk) Tags: Undo Reverted
- 22:19 22:19, 24 June 2024 diff hist +2,463 Tornado records there is no evidence of 300 mph winds, that is a fact unless you have actual evidence to prove otherwise there is no need to spread misinformation. Tags: Manual revert Reverted
- 22:19 22:19, 24 June 2024 diff hist −2,463 Tornado records there is no evidence of 300 mph winds, that is a fact unless you have actual evidence to prove otherwise there is no need to spread misinformation. Tags: Undo Reverted
- 22:13 22:13, 24 June 2024 diff hist −2,463 Tornado records None of these tornadoes have any evidence WHATSOEVER to back up 300, all we have is a poorly made ESSL report which gave no explanation as to why they gave it that, having read through the survey they claim lead them to that conclusion there is nothing noteworthy. Xenia and Lubbok are out of the question, neither of them had anywhere near 300 mph winds, that is common sense. Tri-state is potentially in the 250 ballpark but again no evidence of 300, I know lots of things say 300, but proof? Tag: Reverted
- 21:14 21:14, 24 June 2024 diff hist −256 Tornado records I agree, however the Fujita windspeeds are inaccurate and Xenia had no evidence of 250-300 mph damage, same for Goessel and Lubbok, Tri-state is the only one i can stand behind as being 250.
- 20:53 20:53, 24 June 2024 diff hist −1,622 Tornado records Weather writer see previous edit, despite what some claims are, there is no official way of knowing these were 300, xenia had Ef4 level damage, Woldegk had no indication of 300 mph wind nor did tri-state and the rest, stop trying to spread misinformation thanks.
- 17:34 17:34, 24 June 2024 diff hist −1,834 Tornado records There is no proof or evidence for 300 mph for any, having studied all of these tornadoes thoroughly (including reading the entire german report for Woldegk) there is no evidence that can suggest 300, Xenia would not get EF5 today either. As for Tri-state I am doing my own article on it and have collected a vast array of damage images, nowhere can you find evidence of 300 mph. Tornadoes that had winds >250 are likely Moore 2013 and Smithville.
23 June 2024
- 21:37 21:37, 23 June 2024 diff hist +301 Deaths due to the Chernobyl disaster No edit summary
- 21:26 21:26, 23 June 2024 diff hist 0 Deaths due to the Chernobyl disaster No edit summary
- 21:25 21:25, 23 June 2024 diff hist 0 Deaths due to the Chernobyl disaster No edit summary
- 21:24 21:24, 23 June 2024 diff hist +113 Deaths due to the Chernobyl disaster No edit summary
- 21:17 21:17, 23 June 2024 diff hist +58 Deaths due to the Chernobyl disaster No edit summary
- 21:14 21:14, 23 June 2024 diff hist +51 Deaths due to the Chernobyl disaster No edit summary
- 21:00 21:00, 23 June 2024 diff hist −11 Deaths due to the Chernobyl disaster No edit summary
- 20:58 20:58, 23 June 2024 diff hist +21 Deaths due to the Chernobyl disaster No edit summary
- 20:57 20:57, 23 June 2024 diff hist −28 Deaths due to the Chernobyl disaster No edit summary
- 20:54 20:54, 23 June 2024 diff hist +30 Deaths due to the Chernobyl disaster No edit summary
- 20:52 20:52, 23 June 2024 diff hist +2 Deaths due to the Chernobyl disaster No edit summary
- 20:48 20:48, 23 June 2024 diff hist +34 Deaths due to the Chernobyl disaster No edit summary
- 20:46 20:46, 23 June 2024 diff hist −16 Deaths due to the Chernobyl disaster No edit summary
- 20:45 20:45, 23 June 2024 diff hist +14 Deaths due to the Chernobyl disaster No edit summary
- 20:45 20:45, 23 June 2024 diff hist 0 Deaths due to the Chernobyl disaster Undid revision 1230633617 by Dovah12333 ( talk) Tag: Undo
- 20:44 20:44, 23 June 2024 diff hist 0 Deaths due to the Chernobyl disaster No edit summary Tag: Reverted
- 20:43 20:43, 23 June 2024 diff hist +3 Deaths due to the Chernobyl disaster No edit summary
- 20:41 20:41, 23 June 2024 diff hist 0 Deaths due to the Chernobyl disaster No edit summary
- 20:40 20:40, 23 June 2024 diff hist +65 Deaths due to the Chernobyl disaster No edit summary
30 May 2024
- 22:04 22:04, 30 May 2024 diff hist +1,146 Individual involvement in the Chernobyl disaster No edit summary
26 May 2024
- 13:48 13:48, 26 May 2024 diff hist −2 Individual involvement in the Chernobyl disaster No edit summary
- 13:46 13:46, 26 May 2024 diff hist +3,004 Individual involvement in the Chernobyl disaster some changes.
25 May 2024
- 14:27 14:27, 25 May 2024 diff hist +1,538 Deaths due to the Chernobyl disaster major revision of doses thanks to new sources from Baranov on dose ranges.
- 13:54 13:54, 25 May 2024 diff hist 0 Anatoly Dyatlov fixing dose to be in line with Guskova and Baranov current
A user with 42 edits. Account created on 25 May 2024.
29 June 2024
- 17:01 17:01, 29 June 2024 diff hist +611 Talk:Tornado records →Never observed 300+ mph wind tornadoes: Reply Tag: Reply
- 16:59 16:59, 29 June 2024 diff hist −4,394 Tornado records Information incorrect, sources are old and these tornadoes were in a time where accurate measurements were not available any subsequent estimations are just subjective and by no means worthy of a mention. Please don't go filling people's heads with the idea that a tornado from 1764 was potentially 300 mph when there is zero way one can verify it. Tags: Undo Reverted
- 16:10 16:10, 29 June 2024 diff hist −4,394 Tornado records No edit summary Tag: Reverted
24 June 2024
- 23:10 23:10, 24 June 2024 diff hist +234 Talk:Tornado records →Verification Check: Highest winds observed in a tornado: Reply Tag: Reply
- 22:52 22:52, 24 June 2024 diff hist +148 Talk:Tornado records →Verification Check: Highest winds observed in a tornado: Reply Tag: Reply
- 22:48 22:48, 24 June 2024 diff hist +808 Talk:Tornado records →Verification Check: Highest winds observed in a tornado: Reply Tag: Reply
- 22:40 22:40, 24 June 2024 diff hist +381 Talk:Tornado records →Verification Check: Highest winds observed in a tornado: Reply Tag: Reply
- 22:38 22:38, 24 June 2024 diff hist +503 Talk:Tornado records →Verification Check: Highest winds observed in a tornado: Reply Tag: Reply
- 22:35 22:35, 24 June 2024 diff hist +501 User talk:Dovah12333 →Discussion on Tornado Records: Reply Tag: Reply
- 22:33 22:33, 24 June 2024 diff hist −2,463 Tornado records Fujita messed up Xenia thinking it was F6 originally even when it can barely get EF4 today, there is no actual backing to a 300 rating for ANY of these tornadoes that is objective and scientific, therefore speculation will not be tolerated. I can't believe I even have to say this but, use your common sense. Tags: Undo Reverted
- 22:25 22:25, 24 June 2024 diff hist −2,463 Tornado records Stop trying to spread information that cannot be testified thank you. Unless you can provide evidence as to why 300 mph should be deserved other than the subjective opinion of individuals like Grazulis then you cannot pass it off as fact. Tags: Undo Reverted
- 22:19 22:19, 24 June 2024 diff hist −2,463 Tornado records Undid revision 1230820860 by Dovah12333 ( talk) Tags: Undo Reverted
- 22:19 22:19, 24 June 2024 diff hist +2,463 Tornado records there is no evidence of 300 mph winds, that is a fact unless you have actual evidence to prove otherwise there is no need to spread misinformation. Tags: Manual revert Reverted
- 22:19 22:19, 24 June 2024 diff hist −2,463 Tornado records there is no evidence of 300 mph winds, that is a fact unless you have actual evidence to prove otherwise there is no need to spread misinformation. Tags: Undo Reverted
- 22:13 22:13, 24 June 2024 diff hist −2,463 Tornado records None of these tornadoes have any evidence WHATSOEVER to back up 300, all we have is a poorly made ESSL report which gave no explanation as to why they gave it that, having read through the survey they claim lead them to that conclusion there is nothing noteworthy. Xenia and Lubbok are out of the question, neither of them had anywhere near 300 mph winds, that is common sense. Tri-state is potentially in the 250 ballpark but again no evidence of 300, I know lots of things say 300, but proof? Tag: Reverted
- 21:14 21:14, 24 June 2024 diff hist −256 Tornado records I agree, however the Fujita windspeeds are inaccurate and Xenia had no evidence of 250-300 mph damage, same for Goessel and Lubbok, Tri-state is the only one i can stand behind as being 250.
- 20:53 20:53, 24 June 2024 diff hist −1,622 Tornado records Weather writer see previous edit, despite what some claims are, there is no official way of knowing these were 300, xenia had Ef4 level damage, Woldegk had no indication of 300 mph wind nor did tri-state and the rest, stop trying to spread misinformation thanks.
- 17:34 17:34, 24 June 2024 diff hist −1,834 Tornado records There is no proof or evidence for 300 mph for any, having studied all of these tornadoes thoroughly (including reading the entire german report for Woldegk) there is no evidence that can suggest 300, Xenia would not get EF5 today either. As for Tri-state I am doing my own article on it and have collected a vast array of damage images, nowhere can you find evidence of 300 mph. Tornadoes that had winds >250 are likely Moore 2013 and Smithville.
23 June 2024
- 21:37 21:37, 23 June 2024 diff hist +301 Deaths due to the Chernobyl disaster No edit summary
- 21:26 21:26, 23 June 2024 diff hist 0 Deaths due to the Chernobyl disaster No edit summary
- 21:25 21:25, 23 June 2024 diff hist 0 Deaths due to the Chernobyl disaster No edit summary
- 21:24 21:24, 23 June 2024 diff hist +113 Deaths due to the Chernobyl disaster No edit summary
- 21:17 21:17, 23 June 2024 diff hist +58 Deaths due to the Chernobyl disaster No edit summary
- 21:14 21:14, 23 June 2024 diff hist +51 Deaths due to the Chernobyl disaster No edit summary
- 21:00 21:00, 23 June 2024 diff hist −11 Deaths due to the Chernobyl disaster No edit summary
- 20:58 20:58, 23 June 2024 diff hist +21 Deaths due to the Chernobyl disaster No edit summary
- 20:57 20:57, 23 June 2024 diff hist −28 Deaths due to the Chernobyl disaster No edit summary
- 20:54 20:54, 23 June 2024 diff hist +30 Deaths due to the Chernobyl disaster No edit summary
- 20:52 20:52, 23 June 2024 diff hist +2 Deaths due to the Chernobyl disaster No edit summary
- 20:48 20:48, 23 June 2024 diff hist +34 Deaths due to the Chernobyl disaster No edit summary
- 20:46 20:46, 23 June 2024 diff hist −16 Deaths due to the Chernobyl disaster No edit summary
- 20:45 20:45, 23 June 2024 diff hist +14 Deaths due to the Chernobyl disaster No edit summary
- 20:45 20:45, 23 June 2024 diff hist 0 Deaths due to the Chernobyl disaster Undid revision 1230633617 by Dovah12333 ( talk) Tag: Undo
- 20:44 20:44, 23 June 2024 diff hist 0 Deaths due to the Chernobyl disaster No edit summary Tag: Reverted
- 20:43 20:43, 23 June 2024 diff hist +3 Deaths due to the Chernobyl disaster No edit summary
- 20:41 20:41, 23 June 2024 diff hist 0 Deaths due to the Chernobyl disaster No edit summary
- 20:40 20:40, 23 June 2024 diff hist +65 Deaths due to the Chernobyl disaster No edit summary
30 May 2024
- 22:04 22:04, 30 May 2024 diff hist +1,146 Individual involvement in the Chernobyl disaster No edit summary
26 May 2024
- 13:48 13:48, 26 May 2024 diff hist −2 Individual involvement in the Chernobyl disaster No edit summary
- 13:46 13:46, 26 May 2024 diff hist +3,004 Individual involvement in the Chernobyl disaster some changes.
25 May 2024
- 14:27 14:27, 25 May 2024 diff hist +1,538 Deaths due to the Chernobyl disaster major revision of doses thanks to new sources from Baranov on dose ranges.
- 13:54 13:54, 25 May 2024 diff hist 0 Anatoly Dyatlov fixing dose to be in line with Guskova and Baranov current