A user with 34 edits. Account created on 4 November 2019.
Search for contributionsshowhide
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽

1 July 2023

  • 18:19 18:19, 1 July 2023 diff hist +11 m GimbapMost international resources (as listed here) support the Japanese origin. The insinuation the debate is "just" between Japanese and Korea is unfounded, as even official resources in Korea also support the link between Norimaki and Gimbap.

9 February 2022

  • 10:11 10:11, 9 February 2022 diff hist −14 GimbapRestore fair balance in the discourse on the origin of Gimbap. Further, most international resources (as listed here) support the Japanese origin. Several official resources in Korea also support that origin. The insinuation the debate is "just" between Japanese and Korea is unfounded.

24 February 2021

23 February 2021

22 February 2021

21 February 2021

  • 17:29 17:29, 21 February 2021 diff hist +2 Talk:Comfort womenNo edit summary
  • 17:25 17:25, 21 February 2021 diff hist +4,825 Talk:Comfort womenNo edit summary
  • 15:52 15:52, 21 February 2021 diff hist +19 m GimbapFix wrong source, and removed a source which does not support the claim in the main text. Reformulated text to better reflect the claim supported by the source.
  • 15:45 15:45, 21 February 2021 diff hist −810 m GimbapRemoved the Korean influence theory, as it is unclear what the concept the sentence refers to is. The first mention of Bokssam in Korea dates back to the Joseon era, which is long after the suggested time period for the Korean influence. Instead, reformulated the following sentence to reflect the co-evolution theory as a valid theory among historians, not the "most supported theory" as previously implied - that simply isn't supported by the sources. Tag: references removed
  • 15:39 15:39, 21 February 2021 diff hist +204 m GimbapSurfaced more content from source about the Japanese influence theory of Gimbap. Removed "Japanese historians" as not only Japanese historians support the theory, and as it conveys the false impression of a niche theory.

14 November 2019

6 November 2019

4 November 2019

A user with 34 edits. Account created on 4 November 2019.
Search for contributionsshowhide
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽

1 July 2023

  • 18:19 18:19, 1 July 2023 diff hist +11 m GimbapMost international resources (as listed here) support the Japanese origin. The insinuation the debate is "just" between Japanese and Korea is unfounded, as even official resources in Korea also support the link between Norimaki and Gimbap.

9 February 2022

  • 10:11 10:11, 9 February 2022 diff hist −14 GimbapRestore fair balance in the discourse on the origin of Gimbap. Further, most international resources (as listed here) support the Japanese origin. Several official resources in Korea also support that origin. The insinuation the debate is "just" between Japanese and Korea is unfounded.

24 February 2021

23 February 2021

22 February 2021

21 February 2021

  • 17:29 17:29, 21 February 2021 diff hist +2 Talk:Comfort womenNo edit summary
  • 17:25 17:25, 21 February 2021 diff hist +4,825 Talk:Comfort womenNo edit summary
  • 15:52 15:52, 21 February 2021 diff hist +19 m GimbapFix wrong source, and removed a source which does not support the claim in the main text. Reformulated text to better reflect the claim supported by the source.
  • 15:45 15:45, 21 February 2021 diff hist −810 m GimbapRemoved the Korean influence theory, as it is unclear what the concept the sentence refers to is. The first mention of Bokssam in Korea dates back to the Joseon era, which is long after the suggested time period for the Korean influence. Instead, reformulated the following sentence to reflect the co-evolution theory as a valid theory among historians, not the "most supported theory" as previously implied - that simply isn't supported by the sources. Tag: references removed
  • 15:39 15:39, 21 February 2021 diff hist +204 m GimbapSurfaced more content from source about the Japanese influence theory of Gimbap. Removed "Japanese historians" as not only Japanese historians support the theory, and as it conveys the false impression of a niche theory.

14 November 2019

6 November 2019

4 November 2019


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook