02:2002:20, 13 November 2019diffhist−63
Gender in Dutch grammar
→Neuter nouns: The thing about plural nouns is nonsense. The example given, Denemarken, is not a plural, but a relict of an old case ending. Reference: https://taaldacht.nl/2014/04/09/denemarken-en-andere-marken/
01:0501:05, 1 December 2018diffhist−313
m
Tipalti
The claim that this information is "according to their website" is definitely false, as anyone who visits the customers list on their website can easily see. Furthermore, statements referring to alleged press releases should be supported by corroborating links.
01:3001:30, 12 June 2018diffhist−227
William H. McNeill
Removed the reference to Kaplan's book. Not sure who stuck it in there and why. It's irrelevant to McNeill's work, and neither Kaplan nor the book are referenced in the article. Links to McNeill's own work would be more appropriate.
02:2002:20, 13 November 2019diffhist−63
Gender in Dutch grammar
→Neuter nouns: The thing about plural nouns is nonsense. The example given, Denemarken, is not a plural, but a relict of an old case ending. Reference: https://taaldacht.nl/2014/04/09/denemarken-en-andere-marken/
01:0501:05, 1 December 2018diffhist−313
m
Tipalti
The claim that this information is "according to their website" is definitely false, as anyone who visits the customers list on their website can easily see. Furthermore, statements referring to alleged press releases should be supported by corroborating links.
01:3001:30, 12 June 2018diffhist−227
William H. McNeill
Removed the reference to Kaplan's book. Not sure who stuck it in there and why. It's irrelevant to McNeill's work, and neither Kaplan nor the book are referenced in the article. Links to McNeill's own work would be more appropriate.