A user with 38 edits. Account created on 30 December 2005.
9 December 2013
- 19:00 19:00, 9 December 2013 diff hist −129 m Before Midnight Undid revision 585314660 by 184.101.60.167 ( talk) - I don't object to this, it's just in the wrong place; needs to go under 'Critical Reception' and a citation is needed.
3 May 2011
- 15:32 15:32, 3 May 2011 diff hist −21 Mary McCormack removed 'critically acclaimed' from paragraph for her work on 'In Plain Sight' because it was not sourced.
15 December 2010
- 12:03 12:03, 15 December 2010 diff hist +32 m Aaron Peña found linkrot and added citation. Maintainer of the article can fix this.
- 11:59 11:59, 15 December 2010 diff hist −34 m Aaron Peña Undid revision 402502356 by Cplessinger ( talk) - used wrong tag. Should have used linkrot.
- 11:53 11:53, 15 December 2010 diff hist +34 m Aaron Peña citing broken link
- 11:48 11:48, 15 December 2010 diff hist +38 m Aaron Peña tagged another unsourced claim in the article.
- 11:33 11:33, 15 December 2010 diff hist +2 m Aaron Peña Corrected person's last name
- 11:28 11:28, 15 December 2010 diff hist −4 m Aaron Peña changed verb tense.
- 11:22 11:22, 15 December 2010 diff hist +76 m Aaron Peña Minor edits - again, no source citations.
- 11:20 11:20, 15 December 2010 diff hist +419 Talk:Aaron Peña No edit summary
- 11:17 11:17, 15 December 2010 diff hist +39 m Aaron Peña No citation. Merely stating you did something, without sourcing - ESPECIALLY - if it's part of the public record, should not be difficult.
4 January 2010
- 20:13 20:13, 4 January 2010 diff hist −126 Parker Griffith Removed "Some conservatives are criticizing Griffith for donating money for Howard Dean's and Harry Reid's political campaigns." - for not being sourced and/or ambiguous.
18 November 2009
- 18:45 18:45, 18 November 2009 diff hist +138 User talk:Frank →Strom Thurmond edits
- 18:43 18:43, 18 November 2009 diff hist +89 User talk:Cplessinger →Strom Thurmond
- 18:41 18:41, 18 November 2009 diff hist +259 User talk:Cplessinger No edit summary
- 18:36 18:36, 18 November 2009 diff hist +125 User talk:Frank →Strom Thurmond edits
- 18:34 18:34, 18 November 2009 diff hist +211 User talk:Cplessinger →Strom Thurmond
- 18:28 18:28, 18 November 2009 diff hist +525 User talk:Jusdafax/Archive 2 →Strom Thurmond
- 18:22 18:22, 18 November 2009 diff hist +160 User talk:Frank →Strom Thurmond edits: new section
- 17:41 17:41, 18 November 2009 diff hist −6 User talk:Jusdafax/Archive 2 →Strom Thurmond
- 17:38 17:38, 18 November 2009 diff hist +4 User talk:Jusdafax/Archive 2 →Strom Thurmond
- 17:38 17:38, 18 November 2009 diff hist +1 User talk:Jusdafax/Archive 2 →Strom Thurmond
- 17:37 17:37, 18 November 2009 diff hist +136 User talk:Jusdafax/Archive 2 →Strom Thurmond
- 17:21 17:21, 18 November 2009 diff hist +25 User talk:Jusdafax/Archive 2 →Strom Thurmond
- 17:20 17:20, 18 November 2009 diff hist +119 User talk:Jusdafax/Archive 2 →Strom Thurmond
- 17:17 17:17, 18 November 2009 diff hist +6 m Strom Thurmond Neutral doesn't mean inaccurate. It's inaccurate to write an article about him without describing him as he made his life - to be the definition of racist.
- 17:11 17:11, 18 November 2009 diff hist +6 m Strom Thurmond Reverting to my last edit. This isn't vandalism and if you want to have a discussion about this, then let's talk.
- 17:09 17:09, 18 November 2009 diff hist +344 User talk:Jusdafax/Archive 2 →Strom Thurmond: new section
- 17:03 17:03, 18 November 2009 diff hist +6 Strom Thurmond It's not vandalism and not unverified as you insinuated with your message to me. It's also not vandalism to call a spade a spade (which I think is ironic in this sense).
- 16:54 16:54, 18 November 2009 diff hist +6 m Strom Thurmond This is nothing wrong with my edit. If you're going to continue to try and undo what I do, you could at least bother to document yourself.
- 03:42 03:42, 18 November 2009 diff hist +7 Strom Thurmond Undid revision 326470623 by 71.126.38.93 ( talk)
- 03:30 03:30, 18 November 2009 diff hist +7 Strom Thurmond I can do this all day haters.
- 02:12 02:12, 18 November 2009 diff hist +7 Strom Thurmond Undid revision 326459314 by 65.87.133.189 ( talk)
- 01:53 01:53, 18 November 2009 diff hist +6 m Strom Thurmond Couching his record in soft language by not calling him what he was is tantamount to condoning his behavior.
- 01:34 01:34, 18 November 2009 diff hist +6 Strom Thurmond Undid revision 326450761 by 216.254.25.189 ( talk)
17 November 2009
- 23:59 23:59, 17 November 2009 diff hist +6 m Strom Thurmond Undoing the change misses the point. He chose to make it one of his defining characteristics, so it should be front and center. You can polish a turd, but it's still just a turd.
21 January 2006
- 02:33 02:33, 21 January 2006 diff hist −5 m Trent Reznor remove word 'only'
- 00:01 00:01, 21 January 2006 diff hist −14 m Trent Reznor removed biased comment from end of article 'rather short,'
A user with 38 edits. Account created on 30 December 2005.
9 December 2013
- 19:00 19:00, 9 December 2013 diff hist −129 m Before Midnight Undid revision 585314660 by 184.101.60.167 ( talk) - I don't object to this, it's just in the wrong place; needs to go under 'Critical Reception' and a citation is needed.
3 May 2011
- 15:32 15:32, 3 May 2011 diff hist −21 Mary McCormack removed 'critically acclaimed' from paragraph for her work on 'In Plain Sight' because it was not sourced.
15 December 2010
- 12:03 12:03, 15 December 2010 diff hist +32 m Aaron Peña found linkrot and added citation. Maintainer of the article can fix this.
- 11:59 11:59, 15 December 2010 diff hist −34 m Aaron Peña Undid revision 402502356 by Cplessinger ( talk) - used wrong tag. Should have used linkrot.
- 11:53 11:53, 15 December 2010 diff hist +34 m Aaron Peña citing broken link
- 11:48 11:48, 15 December 2010 diff hist +38 m Aaron Peña tagged another unsourced claim in the article.
- 11:33 11:33, 15 December 2010 diff hist +2 m Aaron Peña Corrected person's last name
- 11:28 11:28, 15 December 2010 diff hist −4 m Aaron Peña changed verb tense.
- 11:22 11:22, 15 December 2010 diff hist +76 m Aaron Peña Minor edits - again, no source citations.
- 11:20 11:20, 15 December 2010 diff hist +419 Talk:Aaron Peña No edit summary
- 11:17 11:17, 15 December 2010 diff hist +39 m Aaron Peña No citation. Merely stating you did something, without sourcing - ESPECIALLY - if it's part of the public record, should not be difficult.
4 January 2010
- 20:13 20:13, 4 January 2010 diff hist −126 Parker Griffith Removed "Some conservatives are criticizing Griffith for donating money for Howard Dean's and Harry Reid's political campaigns." - for not being sourced and/or ambiguous.
18 November 2009
- 18:45 18:45, 18 November 2009 diff hist +138 User talk:Frank →Strom Thurmond edits
- 18:43 18:43, 18 November 2009 diff hist +89 User talk:Cplessinger →Strom Thurmond
- 18:41 18:41, 18 November 2009 diff hist +259 User talk:Cplessinger No edit summary
- 18:36 18:36, 18 November 2009 diff hist +125 User talk:Frank →Strom Thurmond edits
- 18:34 18:34, 18 November 2009 diff hist +211 User talk:Cplessinger →Strom Thurmond
- 18:28 18:28, 18 November 2009 diff hist +525 User talk:Jusdafax/Archive 2 →Strom Thurmond
- 18:22 18:22, 18 November 2009 diff hist +160 User talk:Frank →Strom Thurmond edits: new section
- 17:41 17:41, 18 November 2009 diff hist −6 User talk:Jusdafax/Archive 2 →Strom Thurmond
- 17:38 17:38, 18 November 2009 diff hist +4 User talk:Jusdafax/Archive 2 →Strom Thurmond
- 17:38 17:38, 18 November 2009 diff hist +1 User talk:Jusdafax/Archive 2 →Strom Thurmond
- 17:37 17:37, 18 November 2009 diff hist +136 User talk:Jusdafax/Archive 2 →Strom Thurmond
- 17:21 17:21, 18 November 2009 diff hist +25 User talk:Jusdafax/Archive 2 →Strom Thurmond
- 17:20 17:20, 18 November 2009 diff hist +119 User talk:Jusdafax/Archive 2 →Strom Thurmond
- 17:17 17:17, 18 November 2009 diff hist +6 m Strom Thurmond Neutral doesn't mean inaccurate. It's inaccurate to write an article about him without describing him as he made his life - to be the definition of racist.
- 17:11 17:11, 18 November 2009 diff hist +6 m Strom Thurmond Reverting to my last edit. This isn't vandalism and if you want to have a discussion about this, then let's talk.
- 17:09 17:09, 18 November 2009 diff hist +344 User talk:Jusdafax/Archive 2 →Strom Thurmond: new section
- 17:03 17:03, 18 November 2009 diff hist +6 Strom Thurmond It's not vandalism and not unverified as you insinuated with your message to me. It's also not vandalism to call a spade a spade (which I think is ironic in this sense).
- 16:54 16:54, 18 November 2009 diff hist +6 m Strom Thurmond This is nothing wrong with my edit. If you're going to continue to try and undo what I do, you could at least bother to document yourself.
- 03:42 03:42, 18 November 2009 diff hist +7 Strom Thurmond Undid revision 326470623 by 71.126.38.93 ( talk)
- 03:30 03:30, 18 November 2009 diff hist +7 Strom Thurmond I can do this all day haters.
- 02:12 02:12, 18 November 2009 diff hist +7 Strom Thurmond Undid revision 326459314 by 65.87.133.189 ( talk)
- 01:53 01:53, 18 November 2009 diff hist +6 m Strom Thurmond Couching his record in soft language by not calling him what he was is tantamount to condoning his behavior.
- 01:34 01:34, 18 November 2009 diff hist +6 Strom Thurmond Undid revision 326450761 by 216.254.25.189 ( talk)
17 November 2009
- 23:59 23:59, 17 November 2009 diff hist +6 m Strom Thurmond Undoing the change misses the point. He chose to make it one of his defining characteristics, so it should be front and center. You can polish a turd, but it's still just a turd.
21 January 2006
- 02:33 02:33, 21 January 2006 diff hist −5 m Trent Reznor remove word 'only'
- 00:01 00:01, 21 January 2006 diff hist −14 m Trent Reznor removed biased comment from end of article 'rather short,'