15:0315:03, 8 July 2023diffhist−24
Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry
Come to think of it, when we have to be economical about which shortcuts to include, there's no reason to include ones that are nearly identical, differing only in whether it's in the singular or the plural. But notice that's an actual rationale based on the individual merits of the edit itself, rather than just mindlessly going "them's the rules, no if's or but's".
10:5210:52, 15 June 2023diffhist+36
Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry
Undid revision 1149560609 by
JJMC89 (
talk) Dogmatic misreading and Wikilawyering. If the linkbox were already overflowing, it would make sense to refer to WP:LINKBOXES to cut it down to size. Not allowing any new shortcuts to be added unless and until they become common is not the intention of the guideline and would stagnate the page and impede efforts to aid navigability.Tag: Undo
15:0315:03, 8 July 2023diffhist−24
Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry
Come to think of it, when we have to be economical about which shortcuts to include, there's no reason to include ones that are nearly identical, differing only in whether it's in the singular or the plural. But notice that's an actual rationale based on the individual merits of the edit itself, rather than just mindlessly going "them's the rules, no if's or but's".
10:5210:52, 15 June 2023diffhist+36
Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry
Undid revision 1149560609 by
JJMC89 (
talk) Dogmatic misreading and Wikilawyering. If the linkbox were already overflowing, it would make sense to refer to WP:LINKBOXES to cut it down to size. Not allowing any new shortcuts to be added unless and until they become common is not the intention of the guideline and would stagnate the page and impede efforts to aid navigability.Tag: Undo