17:5817:58, 3 October 2021diffhist+494
Flag of Mississippi
Reverted
good faith edits by
Generalrelative: How is the language undue? How does it make a point? It's factual language, there are no loaded words, and it's important to note what was/was not an option in the referendum. What 'consensus' are you talking about? What 'others"? You and your friend? You are giving me the run-around, we've finished with the source now you want to talk about the language/placement.Tags: TwinkleUndoReverted
17:1117:11, 3 October 2021diffhist+242
Serbian–Montenegrin unionism
Reverted
good faith edits by
Generalrelative (
talk): Original synthesis HOW ??? You are now harassing me across several pages. What is your hangup? The source clearly states appx. 30% of people in Montenegro identified as Serbs. If you want I can add another source for cultural similarity but it's self evident as with all South Slavs.Tags: TwinkleUndo
17:2817:28, 1 October 2021diffhist−17
Miscegenation
It's not a matter of 'consideration'. You are born having one or several racial origins, etc, which are associated with your genes. How can ancestry-examination services such as Ancestry.com or 23-and-me function if race is simply a 'social construct' or class system with no basis in biological reality?Tags: Manual revertReverted
01:1701:17, 1 October 2021diffhist+421
List of common misconceptions
Undid revision 1047433962 by
Macrakis (
talk) Well, it is a hypothesis after all. There is some evidence that seems to be for it, and some that seems to be against it. It is not the responsibility of Wikipedia to decide if it is true or false, just to prevent relevant information. In this case, as we are discussing pre-Columbian arrivals and inhabitants in the Americas, the Solutrean hypothesis is relevant.Tags: RevertedDisambiguation links added
17:5817:58, 3 October 2021diffhist+494
Flag of Mississippi
Reverted
good faith edits by
Generalrelative: How is the language undue? How does it make a point? It's factual language, there are no loaded words, and it's important to note what was/was not an option in the referendum. What 'consensus' are you talking about? What 'others"? You and your friend? You are giving me the run-around, we've finished with the source now you want to talk about the language/placement.Tags: TwinkleUndoReverted
17:1117:11, 3 October 2021diffhist+242
Serbian–Montenegrin unionism
Reverted
good faith edits by
Generalrelative (
talk): Original synthesis HOW ??? You are now harassing me across several pages. What is your hangup? The source clearly states appx. 30% of people in Montenegro identified as Serbs. If you want I can add another source for cultural similarity but it's self evident as with all South Slavs.Tags: TwinkleUndo
17:2817:28, 1 October 2021diffhist−17
Miscegenation
It's not a matter of 'consideration'. You are born having one or several racial origins, etc, which are associated with your genes. How can ancestry-examination services such as Ancestry.com or 23-and-me function if race is simply a 'social construct' or class system with no basis in biological reality?Tags: Manual revertReverted
01:1701:17, 1 October 2021diffhist+421
List of common misconceptions
Undid revision 1047433962 by
Macrakis (
talk) Well, it is a hypothesis after all. There is some evidence that seems to be for it, and some that seems to be against it. It is not the responsibility of Wikipedia to decide if it is true or false, just to prevent relevant information. In this case, as we are discussing pre-Columbian arrivals and inhabitants in the Americas, the Solutrean hypothesis is relevant.Tags: RevertedDisambiguation links added