A user with 21 edits. Account created on 14 March 2007.
23 April 2009
17:0317:03, 23 April 2009diffhist−273
Teesta Setalvad
removing the content stating that she has criticised CPI party for Nandigram violence, as the reference has expired. References stating the same isn't available. Please attach a valid reference.
00:2900:29, 23 April 2009diffhist−751
Teesta Setalvad
Undid revision 285451104 SIT directory never confirmed whether the TOI report contents were false. He said that he's answerable only to Supreme Court, thus denied leaking the report.
00:3100:31, 21 March 2009diffhist+277
Shivraj Patil
Restoring content which was present since 02/21/09 but deleted without no reason. Please see discussion page. Valid references are provided.
21:1421:14, 16 March 2009diffhist+277
Shivraj Patil
Undoing my changes. When there is a reference to prove a point, why that point shouldn't be included? Are we not allowed to write an important point?
20:4520:45, 16 March 2009diffhist+376
m
Shivraj Patil
I'm adding an important decision that this politician had been following since he had been elected to office. I've so many references to prove that. I have no idea why this was removed.
A user with 21 edits. Account created on 14 March 2007.
23 April 2009
17:0317:03, 23 April 2009diffhist−273
Teesta Setalvad
removing the content stating that she has criticised CPI party for Nandigram violence, as the reference has expired. References stating the same isn't available. Please attach a valid reference.
00:2900:29, 23 April 2009diffhist−751
Teesta Setalvad
Undid revision 285451104 SIT directory never confirmed whether the TOI report contents were false. He said that he's answerable only to Supreme Court, thus denied leaking the report.
00:3100:31, 21 March 2009diffhist+277
Shivraj Patil
Restoring content which was present since 02/21/09 but deleted without no reason. Please see discussion page. Valid references are provided.
21:1421:14, 16 March 2009diffhist+277
Shivraj Patil
Undoing my changes. When there is a reference to prove a point, why that point shouldn't be included? Are we not allowed to write an important point?
20:4520:45, 16 March 2009diffhist+376
m
Shivraj Patil
I'm adding an important decision that this politician had been following since he had been elected to office. I've so many references to prove that. I have no idea why this was removed.