16:4616:46, 10 June 2013diffhist−270
m
University of Winnipeg
Misleading: UW is **not** a research university. Therefore, including its ranking among "top research universities" misleading, especially in the introduction.
17:4617:46, 21 April 2013diffhist−2,160
m
The China Study
→Reception: Criticism of the book should cite notable sources, not amateurish blogs by flagrantly partisan hacks. Also, citing studies that merely reach different conclusions has nothing to do with the RECEPTION of the book.
01:1901:19, 12 April 2013diffhist−523
m
Trimethylamine N-oxide
→Health issues: Non-objective assessment that appeals to the authority of a non-objective scientist who works for a non-objective, pro-meat advocacy organization. Has no place in an encyclopedia entry.
30 March 2013
00:2200:22, 30 March 2013diffhist−189
m
Lipid hypothesis
Amateurish website that does not deserve to be cited as an authoritative reference or example of serious opposition to the lipid hypothesis.
04:3104:31, 29 March 2013diffhist−742
Ancel Keys
→Criticism: These are partisan criticisms that reference promotional websites and a YouTube video, not peer-reviewed studies. They have no place in an encyclopedia entry.
16:4616:46, 10 June 2013diffhist−270
m
University of Winnipeg
Misleading: UW is **not** a research university. Therefore, including its ranking among "top research universities" misleading, especially in the introduction.
17:4617:46, 21 April 2013diffhist−2,160
m
The China Study
→Reception: Criticism of the book should cite notable sources, not amateurish blogs by flagrantly partisan hacks. Also, citing studies that merely reach different conclusions has nothing to do with the RECEPTION of the book.
01:1901:19, 12 April 2013diffhist−523
m
Trimethylamine N-oxide
→Health issues: Non-objective assessment that appeals to the authority of a non-objective scientist who works for a non-objective, pro-meat advocacy organization. Has no place in an encyclopedia entry.
30 March 2013
00:2200:22, 30 March 2013diffhist−189
m
Lipid hypothesis
Amateurish website that does not deserve to be cited as an authoritative reference or example of serious opposition to the lipid hypothesis.
04:3104:31, 29 March 2013diffhist−742
Ancel Keys
→Criticism: These are partisan criticisms that reference promotional websites and a YouTube video, not peer-reviewed studies. They have no place in an encyclopedia entry.