6 August 2015

• 16:46 16:46, 6 August 2015 diff hist +586‎ Talk:Vani Hari ‎ →‎Section blanking and other edits
• 15:52 15:52, 6 August 2015 diff hist +654‎ Talk:Vani Hari ‎ →‎Section blanking and other edits
• 15:46 15:46, 6 August 2015 diff hist −4,216‎ Vani Hari ‎ reverting before David Gerard went on a unsubstantiated editing spree. Please discuss on talk and get consensus before going wild

29 July 2015

• 23:01 23:01, 29 July 2015 diff hist +649‎ Talk:Vani Hari ‎ →‎Section blanking and other edits
• 18:51 18:51, 29 July 2015 diff hist −3,990‎ Skeptical Inquirer ‎ this article was entirely too long with non-essential information and supported only by primary sources.

28 July 2015

• 20:53 20:53, 28 July 2015 diff hist +18‎ Vani Hari ‎No edit summary
• 20:42 20:42, 28 July 2015 diff hist +280‎ Talk:Vani Hari ‎ →‎Section blanking and other edits
• 17:55 17:55, 28 July 2015 diff hist −2,214‎ Vani Hari ‎ I am going to again attempt to summarize, as nobody else seems to be responding on talk page. please refer to talk page prior to reverting

22 July 2015

• 13:59 13:59, 22 July 2015 diff hist +200‎ Talk:Vani Hari ‎ →‎Section blanking and other edits

20 July 2015

• 21:17 21:17, 20 July 2015 diff hist +20‎ Skeptical Inquirer ‎ this whole page needs 3rd party sources. significantly too long and reliant on primary sources currently
• 20:58 20:58, 20 July 2015 diff hist +658‎ Talk:Vani Hari ‎ →‎Section blanking and other edits
• 20:53 20:53, 20 July 2015 diff hist −2,129‎ Vani Hari ‎ Undid revision 672325689 by Dbrodbeck ( talk) I agree. The section you restored is too long to stand on one loose source. I summarized previously. If you'd like to summarize in different manner
• 20:49 20:49, 20 July 2015 diff hist −2,129‎ Vani Hari ‎ Undid revision 672245644 by Andy Dingley ( talk) Again, the section was not blanked. It was summarized. Please review edits prior to reverting
• 02:50 02:50, 20 July 2015 diff hist −2,129‎ Vani Hari ‎ the section was summarized, not blanked. it cannot exist as stands, given one non-major source repeated throughout

14 July 2015

• 16:34 16:34, 14 July 2015 diff hist −12‎ G-Eazy ‎No edit summary
• 15:31 15:31, 14 July 2015 diff hist +358‎ Talk:Vani Hari ‎ →‎Section blanking and other edits
• 15:27 15:27, 14 July 2015 diff hist −2,498‎ Vani Hari ‎ summarized. each article cannot be essentially completely rewritten on page. especially given the rest of information related to author. far too much undue weight. it must be balanced
• 15:24 15:24, 14 July 2015 diff hist +327‎ 50 Cent ‎ →‎Business career
• 15:16 15:16, 14 July 2015 diff hist −2,985‎ Vani Hari ‎ Undid revision 671381356 by David Gerard ( talk) absolutely not. undue weight. summarize. cannot take up 1/4 the page
• 03:47 03:47, 14 July 2015 diff hist −304‎ Vani Hari ‎ again, unfair to quote heavily from individual articles
• 03:46 03:46, 14 July 2015 diff hist −2,681‎ Vani Hari ‎ again, one article from a non-top tier source cannot dominate a quarter of the page. undue weight. try paraphrasing.
• 03:45 03:45, 14 July 2015 diff hist +469‎ Talk:Vani Hari ‎ →‎Section blanking and other edits

6 July 2015

• 16:57 16:57, 6 July 2015 diff hist 0‎ Reddit ‎ →‎Controversies involving reddit
• 16:52 16:52, 6 July 2015 diff hist −292‎ Vani Hari ‎ →‎Criticism: again, undue weight given to individual article
• 16:48 16:48, 6 July 2015 diff hist −2,682‎ Vani Hari ‎ there is way too much undue weight given to one article. articles cannot have complete sections dedicated

3 July 2015

• 17:12 17:12, 3 July 2015 diff hist 0‎ Ellen Pao ‎ →‎Career

27 April 2015

• 18:20 18:20, 27 April 2015 diff hist −7‎ Vani Hari ‎ widely is not correct term. in the ratio of total people in support, or the total scientific community
• 18:18 18:18, 27 April 2015 diff hist −163‎ Vani Hari ‎ this is repeated and again many times below, if you take positives out of lead, you must also balance
• 18:16 18:16, 27 April 2015 diff hist +926‎ Vani Hari ‎ adding this section back. if criticism is to be added, so must recognition

20 April 2015

• 22:33 22:33, 20 April 2015 diff hist +436‎ Vani Hari ‎No edit summary
• 22:18 22:18, 20 April 2015 diff hist +551‎ Vani Hari ‎ moving book information into new section, since it is often getting mentioned

8 April 2015

• 01:47 01:47, 8 April 2015 diff hist +22‎ Luminate (company) ‎ →‎Viewing
• 01:41 01:41, 8 April 2015 diff hist +8‎ Jon Cohen (entrepreneur) ‎ formatting
• 01:40 01:40, 8 April 2015 diff hist +2‎ Jon Cohen (entrepreneur) ‎ →‎References

23 August 2013

• 20:38 20:38, 23 August 2013 diff hist +1‎ m Seven Psychopaths ‎ →‎Box office performance Tag: Visual edit
• 20:35 20:35, 23 August 2013 diff hist +136‎ Brendan Gleeson ‎ →‎Career: adding citation
• 20:32 20:32, 23 August 2013 diff hist +183‎ Six Shooter (film) ‎ adding source
• 20:28 20:28, 23 August 2013 diff hist +1‎ Martin McDonagh ‎ →‎Film Tag: Visual edit
• 20:25 20:25, 23 August 2013 diff hist +1‎ m Terry Moore (soccer) ‎No edit summary Tag: Visual edit

21 August 2013

• 23:16 23:16, 21 August 2013 diff hist +13‎ In Bruges ‎No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
• 23:10 23:10, 21 August 2013 diff hist +231‎ DJ Shadow ‎ →‎Controversies: adding citation
• 23:03 23:03, 21 August 2013 diff hist +46‎ Vybz Kartel ‎ →‎Murder charges: fixing citation Tag: Visual edit
• 22:44 22:44, 21 August 2013 diff hist −1‎ MBC Max ‎ date formatting Tag: Visual edit
• 22:43 22:43, 21 August 2013 diff hist +1‎ m Dragoncharm ‎ punctuation Tag: Visual edit
• 00:19 00:19, 21 August 2013 diff hist +1‎ m Jonathan Banks ‎ →‎Career
• 00:16 00:16, 21 August 2013 diff hist 0‎ m Giancarlo Esposito ‎ punctuation
• 00:12 00:12, 21 August 2013 diff hist 0‎ RJ Mitte ‎ formatting Tag: Visual edit
• 00:01 00:01, 21 August 2013 diff hist +3‎ m Clerks: The Animated Series ‎ →‎Broadcast history: wording Tag: Visual edit

20 August 2013

• 23:58 23:58, 20 August 2013 diff hist +12‎ Vince Gilligan ‎No edit summary Tag: Visual edit

19 August 2013

• 13:33 13:33, 19 August 2013 diff hist +1‎ m Tom Sizemore ‎ →‎Acting career Tag: Visual edit