23:1123:11, 26 July 2011diffhist−1,105
Wade Sanders
See discussion. Five pillars of Wikipedia suggest unsubtantiated, even if you believe they are true, should not be here. See previous edit re: Boston Globe. It is a circular reference to a Navy Times article that no one can prove exists.
23:0123:01, 26 July 2011diffhist−774
Wade Sanders
The second citation listed as a reference is an unsubstantiated forum post on a personal web site. The first citation is a circular reference to the second citation.Tag: section blanking
22:5022:50, 26 July 2011diffhist−204
Wade Sanders
The Boston Globe article used as a reference for this statement had only one source: an unsubstantiated forum post on a personal web site.Tag: references removed
22:1822:18, 26 July 2011diffhist−518
Wade Sanders
There is no reliable source to confirm the silver star being rescinded. The statement only referenced an opinion blog on Politico. The Politico blog made an unlinked, hypothetical reference to The Navy Times.Tag: references removed
23:1123:11, 26 July 2011diffhist−1,105
Wade Sanders
See discussion. Five pillars of Wikipedia suggest unsubtantiated, even if you believe they are true, should not be here. See previous edit re: Boston Globe. It is a circular reference to a Navy Times article that no one can prove exists.
23:0123:01, 26 July 2011diffhist−774
Wade Sanders
The second citation listed as a reference is an unsubstantiated forum post on a personal web site. The first citation is a circular reference to the second citation.Tag: section blanking
22:5022:50, 26 July 2011diffhist−204
Wade Sanders
The Boston Globe article used as a reference for this statement had only one source: an unsubstantiated forum post on a personal web site.Tag: references removed
22:1822:18, 26 July 2011diffhist−518
Wade Sanders
There is no reliable source to confirm the silver star being rescinded. The statement only referenced an opinion blog on Politico. The Politico blog made an unlinked, hypothetical reference to The Navy Times.Tag: references removed