2 March 2007

• 03:53 03:53, 2 March 2007 diff hist +132‎ User:Consumed Crustacean ‎ →‎suggestions
• 03:40 03:40, 2 March 2007 diff hist +179‎ User:Consumed Crustacean ‎ →‎Related / semi-related / unrelated external links
• 03:06 03:06, 2 March 2007 diff hist +2,664‎ Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/190.53.15.171 ‎ →‎[[User:190.53.15.171]]
• 02:42 02:42, 2 March 2007 diff hist +768‎ Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/190.53.15.171 ‎ →‎[[User:190.53.15.171]]

1 March 2007

• 22:41 22:41, 1 March 2007 diff hist +57‎ Talk:Nicaragua ‎ →‎nobody else makes discussions
• 22:39 22:39, 1 March 2007 diff hist +1,802‎ Talk:Nicaragua ‎ →‎nobody else makes discussions
• 05:08 05:08, 1 March 2007 diff hist +753‎ Talk:Larry Sanger ‎ →‎Wiki Concerns
• 05:05 05:05, 1 March 2007 diff hist +746‎ Wikipedia:Help desk ‎ →‎ABout wikipedia administrator
• 04:59 04:59, 1 March 2007 diff hist +746‎ User talk:Woohookitty ‎ →‎personal attacks!
• 04:47 04:47, 1 March 2007 diff hist +411‎ User talk:Woohookitty ‎ →‎Continual stubbornness
• 04:44 04:44, 1 March 2007 diff hist +1,559‎ User talk:Woohookitty ‎ →‎Advice
• 04:32 04:32, 1 March 2007 diff hist +677‎ Talk:Nicaragua ‎ →‎nobody else makes discussions
• 04:28 04:28, 1 March 2007 diff hist −9‎ Talk:Nicaragua ‎ →‎nobody else makes discussions
• 04:27 04:27, 1 March 2007 diff hist +1,103‎ Talk:Nicaragua ‎ →‎nobody else makes discussions
• 04:16 04:16, 1 March 2007 diff hist +1,270‎ User talk:Agrofe ‎ →‎Nicaragua Edits
• 04:06 04:06, 1 March 2007 diff hist 0‎ Talk:Nicaragua ‎ →‎nobody else makes discussions
• 04:05 04:05, 1 March 2007 diff hist +2‎ Talk:Nicaragua ‎ →‎nobody else makes discussions
• 01:27 01:27, 1 March 2007 diff hist +298‎ Talk:Nicaragua ‎ →‎this article
• 01:17 01:17, 1 March 2007 diff hist +238‎ Talk:Costa Rica ‎ →‎Review
• 01:14 01:14, 1 March 2007 diff hist +751‎ Talk:El Salvador ‎ →‎help with Tourism section
• 01:07 01:07, 1 March 2007 diff hist +939‎ Talk:Nicaragua ‎ →‎this article

28 February 2007

• 21:32 21:32, 28 February 2007 diff hist +1,681‎ Talk:Nicaragua ‎ →‎CRIME
• 21:22 21:22, 28 February 2007 diff hist −1,524‎ Nicaragua ‎ sources must come from a neutral point of view meaning your source can't be from a site that promotes tourism in that country
• 03:35 03:35, 28 February 2007 diff hist +678‎ Talk:Nicaragua ‎ →‎CRIME
• 03:14 03:14, 28 February 2007 diff hist +270‎ Talk:Nicaragua ‎ →‎this article
• 03:08 03:08, 28 February 2007 diff hist +384‎ Talk:Nicaragua ‎ →‎this article
• 03:04 03:04, 28 February 2007 diff hist +774‎ Talk:Nicaragua ‎ →‎this article
• 02:59 02:59, 28 February 2007 diff hist +586‎ Talk:Nicaragua ‎ →‎this article
• 02:50 02:50, 28 February 2007 diff hist +383‎ Talk:Nicaragua ‎ →‎CRIME
• 02:48 02:48, 28 February 2007 diff hist +772‎ Talk:Nicaragua ‎ crime
• 02:42 02:42, 28 February 2007 diff hist +3,121‎ Nicaragua ‎ this is a crime section with a good source what is wrong with you people you just take in what you like, wikipedia is composed of volunteers that just add articles that go with their personal opinion
• 02:28 02:28, 28 February 2007 diff hist +2,864‎ Nicaragua ‎ an article with a reliable source its from the government wich means no playing favorites, also if you dont like it contact the president

21 February 2007

• 05:49 05:49, 21 February 2007 diff hist −1,079‎ Nicaragua ‎ this section does not provide with any sources at all
• 04:48 04:48, 21 February 2007 diff hist +581‎ Talk:Nicaragua ‎ →‎crime
• 04:43 04:43, 21 February 2007 diff hist −35‎ Talk:Nicaragua ‎ discussion

18 February 2007

• 02:32 02:32, 18 February 2007 diff hist +1,223‎ Talk:Nicaragua ‎ FURTHER ASSISTANCE

17 February 2007

• 10:52 10:52, 17 February 2007 diff hist −86‎ Talk:Nicaragua ‎ sources
• 10:50 10:50, 17 February 2007 diff hist −6,707‎ Talk:Nicaragua ‎ i see your job is to talk about people and not to do what you are here for obviously agrofe you want this article to have your opinion but it doesnt work that way if problems persist...
• 10:45 10:45, 17 February 2007 diff hist −911‎ Talk:Nicaragua ‎ sources of my crime section
• 10:32 10:32, 17 February 2007 diff hist −3,086‎ Nicaragua ‎ this section of the article contains no sources at all, wikipedia's policy states artcles must have a source from a neutral poitn of view

15 February 2007

• 00:14 00:14, 15 February 2007 diff hist +2‎ Nicaragua ‎No edit summary
• 00:12 00:12, 15 February 2007 diff hist −235‎ Nicaragua ‎ THIS ARTICLE DOESNT CONTAIN ANY SOURCES FROM A NEUTRAL POINT OF VIEW BUT WHAT I ADDED IS FROM A NEWSPAPER SO READ IT
• 00:04 00:04, 15 February 2007 diff hist +1,055‎ Nicaragua ‎ my sources are reliable you can read them yourself this is not my opinion my source states everything i have written here

14 February 2007

• 23:57 23:57, 14 February 2007 diff hist +1,195‎ N User:Agrofe ‎ i have provided good sources for this article and they were deleted i dont understand!
• 23:46 23:46, 14 February 2007 diff hist −481‎ Nicaragua ‎ wikipedia rules state, sources must be from a neutral point of view, that it has to be a newspaper or something that doesnt promote tourism in the country.The source for this section promotes tourism
• 23:43 23:43, 14 February 2007 diff hist −1,691‎ Nicaragua ‎ honestly what language do i need to speak to you in for you to understand that this section doesnt have sources from a neutral point of view this is your wikipedia rule and not even you follow it!

13 February 2007

• 22:44 22:44, 13 February 2007 diff hist −565‎ El Salvador ‎ why is el salvador the only country that has a crime section and no tourism section!? all central america has crime why is el salvador the only one with a crime section? that is racial descrimination!
• 22:43 22:43, 13 February 2007 diff hist +1,349‎ Nicaragua ‎ i added some helpful information for tourist safety and a few newspaper articles about nicaraguas economy
• 22:26 22:26, 13 February 2007 diff hist −481‎ Nicaragua ‎ that article is from a website that promotes tourism it is not from a neutral point of view
• 22:24 22:24, 13 February 2007 diff hist −1,692‎ Nicaragua ‎ this article comes from a personal point of view the tourism section does not contain any sources it is not from a neutral point of view