22:0922:09, 17 January 2019diffhist−6,317
George Washington University
→Controversies: This section doesn't exist for any similar institution. An incident that moved the university rankings down one spot is not appropriate for this venue. None of the items discussed had any impact on the university from a historical perspective, and there is no justification for the amount of space taken on the page to discuss any of this. I will be entering this into a third party dispute if added back in. This is way out of line.
22:0322:03, 17 January 2019diffhist+303
George Washington University
→Controversies: This section is inappropriate. There is no other institutional I can find on wikipedia of a remotely similar size that has any kind of controversies section. There is absolutely no reason for this to be on a page with a list of the schools, alumni, and other items. Emphasis on this is extremely disproportional relative to the content on the page. It could be its own page, but should not be included on the main article of the university.
21:5521:55, 17 January 2019diffhist0
m
George Washington University
Moved the demographics of the university's student body out of the controversies section, as they belong in the enrollment section with the other enrollment information. This isn't a logical place for it away from the other information related to institutional statistics. This of course also implies that I removed it from the controversies section as to avoid a duplicate of the information. No content has been adjusted whatsoever other than it's placement in another section.
22:0922:09, 17 January 2019diffhist−6,317
George Washington University
→Controversies: This section doesn't exist for any similar institution. An incident that moved the university rankings down one spot is not appropriate for this venue. None of the items discussed had any impact on the university from a historical perspective, and there is no justification for the amount of space taken on the page to discuss any of this. I will be entering this into a third party dispute if added back in. This is way out of line.
22:0322:03, 17 January 2019diffhist+303
George Washington University
→Controversies: This section is inappropriate. There is no other institutional I can find on wikipedia of a remotely similar size that has any kind of controversies section. There is absolutely no reason for this to be on a page with a list of the schools, alumni, and other items. Emphasis on this is extremely disproportional relative to the content on the page. It could be its own page, but should not be included on the main article of the university.
21:5521:55, 17 January 2019diffhist0
m
George Washington University
Moved the demographics of the university's student body out of the controversies section, as they belong in the enrollment section with the other enrollment information. This isn't a logical place for it away from the other information related to institutional statistics. This of course also implies that I removed it from the controversies section as to avoid a duplicate of the information. No content has been adjusted whatsoever other than it's placement in another section.