16:2216:22, 5 December 2019diffhist+1,102
Massimo Introvigne
Perhaps proving that I am not "Introvigne's secretary" (who presumably should have known of Ashcraft's book long ago), I introduced references to the only scholarly book recently published discussing the significance of Introvigne in the history of NRM studies
16:0416:04, 5 December 2019diffhist+1,308
CESNUR
Included authoritative book by Ashcraft, which is a history of scholarship on new religious movements and discusses CESNUR. For the other change, see talk page
09:2409:24, 1 November 2019diffhist+2
CESNUR
→Criticism: please read the paper (I did) at [https://www.cesnur.org/testi/greenlist.html]. It consists of 20 paragraphs. Only one paragraph mentions the AUM investigation.
16:2216:22, 5 December 2019diffhist+1,102
Massimo Introvigne
Perhaps proving that I am not "Introvigne's secretary" (who presumably should have known of Ashcraft's book long ago), I introduced references to the only scholarly book recently published discussing the significance of Introvigne in the history of NRM studies
16:0416:04, 5 December 2019diffhist+1,308
CESNUR
Included authoritative book by Ashcraft, which is a history of scholarship on new religious movements and discusses CESNUR. For the other change, see talk page
09:2409:24, 1 November 2019diffhist+2
CESNUR
→Criticism: please read the paper (I did) at [https://www.cesnur.org/testi/greenlist.html]. It consists of 20 paragraphs. Only one paragraph mentions the AUM investigation.