19:0819:08, 8 August 2009diffhist−429
Origin of the Romanians
removed vague statement. if you repost it plese specify which characteristics and why do they disprove the continuity theory.
09:0909:09, 26 April 2009diffhist−77
m
Nicolaus Olahus
if you insisist they are not useless then pleaese tell me how do a couple of outdated names contribute to the qualitty of this article?
07:5607:56, 26 March 2009diffhist−366
Iași
hungarian is not a indo-europeean language. sarmatian was a indo-european language. therfore no conecction between them.
17:1217:12, 21 March 2009diffhist−406
Origin of the Romanians
the final paragraph does not appear in the alexiad, at least i did not find it. if it does my apologies for deleting it, though i would like to know the book and the chapter.
17:1017:10, 21 March 2009diffhist−242
Origin of the Romanians
fixed minor errors. boroska please explain how does a nation that did not set foot north of the danube until the 12th century become "dacian raiders from the north of the danube."
12:0912:09, 21 March 2009diffhist+1,043
Origin of the Romanians
really where? i didn't see any source. my source is the alexiad. she says the raiders came from NORTH of the danube. at that time hungarians were still living WEST of the danube
10:2710:27, 21 March 2009diffhist+1,043
Origin of the Romanians
removing information based on your own interpretations of the text is considerd vandalism.
19:0819:08, 8 August 2009diffhist−429
Origin of the Romanians
removed vague statement. if you repost it plese specify which characteristics and why do they disprove the continuity theory.
09:0909:09, 26 April 2009diffhist−77
m
Nicolaus Olahus
if you insisist they are not useless then pleaese tell me how do a couple of outdated names contribute to the qualitty of this article?
07:5607:56, 26 March 2009diffhist−366
Iași
hungarian is not a indo-europeean language. sarmatian was a indo-european language. therfore no conecction between them.
17:1217:12, 21 March 2009diffhist−406
Origin of the Romanians
the final paragraph does not appear in the alexiad, at least i did not find it. if it does my apologies for deleting it, though i would like to know the book and the chapter.
17:1017:10, 21 March 2009diffhist−242
Origin of the Romanians
fixed minor errors. boroska please explain how does a nation that did not set foot north of the danube until the 12th century become "dacian raiders from the north of the danube."
12:0912:09, 21 March 2009diffhist+1,043
Origin of the Romanians
really where? i didn't see any source. my source is the alexiad. she says the raiders came from NORTH of the danube. at that time hungarians were still living WEST of the danube
10:2710:27, 21 March 2009diffhist+1,043
Origin of the Romanians
removing information based on your own interpretations of the text is considerd vandalism.