25 October 2010

• 03:31 03:31, 25 October 2010 diff hist −88‎ Skaar (character) ‎ →‎Powers and abilities: removing OR

24 October 2010

• 20:34 20:34, 24 October 2010 diff hist +237‎ Talk:Let Me In (film) ‎ →‎NOT A REMAKE... PERIOD!
• 20:31 20:31, 24 October 2010 diff hist +1,604‎ Talk:Let Me In (film) ‎ →‎NOT A REMAKE... PERIOD!
• 04:43 04:43, 24 October 2010 diff hist −291‎ Children of the Corn IV: The Gathering ‎ →‎Plot: IMDB NOT RELIABLE
• 03:42 03:42, 24 October 2010 diff hist +826‎ Talk:Let Me In (film) ‎ →‎NOT A REMAKE... PERIOD!
• 01:25 01:25, 24 October 2010 diff hist +1‎ Light Yagami ‎ read the discussion page and look at the definition of protagonist. a protagonist is the main character. he doesnt have to be good.

23 October 2010

• 23:34 23:34, 23 October 2010 diff hist −35‎ Hope (Xena: Warrior Princess) ‎No edit summary
• 23:15 23:15, 23 October 2010 diff hist −276‎ Slappy the Dummy ‎ →‎See also: this is OR Tag: section blanking
• 23:13 23:13, 23 October 2010 diff hist −276‎ Slappy the Dummy ‎ →‎See also Tag: section blanking
• 22:58 22:58, 23 October 2010 diff hist −107‎ Chucky (Child's Play) ‎ →‎See also Tag: section blanking
• 22:57 22:57, 23 October 2010 diff hist −170‎ Chucky (Child's Play) ‎No edit summary
• 22:53 22:53, 23 October 2010 diff hist +1‎ Light Yagami ‎ Undid revision 392404647 by 75.184.96.70 ( talk)hes the protagonist.
• 06:20 06:20, 23 October 2010 diff hist +1‎ Light Yagami ‎ hes the protagonist as he is the main focus of the story
• 06:19 06:19, 23 October 2010 diff hist −30‎ Light Yagami ‎ not a demon

22 October 2010

• 04:51 04:51, 22 October 2010 diff hist +33‎ Dax (Star Trek) ‎ →‎Joran Dax

21 October 2010

• 04:54 04:54, 21 October 2010 diff hist +235‎ User talk:99.192.87.226 ‎No edit summary
• 04:51 04:51, 21 October 2010 diff hist −137‎ Let Me In (film) ‎ do you not even read the sources? no one said it was based off the movie. yet no one pays attention. its not vandalism. not one source says it. show one.
• 04:46 04:46, 21 October 2010 diff hist −137‎ Let Me In (film) ‎ no one listens. not one source has anyone involved with the making of the movie say its a remake. its all reviewers and yet people keep sourcing and anding OR and unneeded detail, yet im vandalising
• 04:40 04:40, 21 October 2010 diff hist −137‎ Let Me In (film) ‎ it is not vandalism. does anyone read the sources. only reveiwers call it a remake. not ONE person who made the movie said it was based off of the 2008 film.
• 02:34 02:34, 21 October 2010 diff hist −137‎ Let Me In (film) ‎No edit summary
• 02:33 02:33, 21 October 2010 diff hist +661‎ Talk:Let Me In (film) ‎ →‎NOT A REMAKE... PERIOD!
• 02:28 02:28, 21 October 2010 diff hist −551‎ Let Me In (film) ‎ →‎Plot: removing unnecessary
• 02:18 02:18, 21 October 2010 diff hist +548‎ Talk:Let Me In (film) ‎ →‎Can the "Premise" section be eliminated?

20 October 2010

• 03:08 03:08, 20 October 2010 diff hist +196‎ User talk:99.92.130.150 ‎No edit summary

19 October 2010

• 21:56 21:56, 19 October 2010 diff hist +259‎ Talk:Let Me In (film) ‎ →‎NOT A REMAKE... PERIOD!
• 21:49 21:49, 19 October 2010 diff hist −137‎ Let Me In (film) ‎ Undid revision 391714075 by 129.63.166.39 ( talk)
• 20:22 20:22, 19 October 2010 diff hist −137‎ Let Me In (film) ‎ Writer Ajvide Lindqvist, on the other hand, says that Reeves told him that he "will make a new film based on the book, and not remake the Swedish film" and so "it'll be something completely different"
• 20:01 20:01, 19 October 2010 diff hist −137‎ Let Me In (film) ‎ read the article. the producer says it then contradicts himself saying its not a remake. not only that the author says its not stop using OR like you have been through out this article
• 19:33 19:33, 19 October 2010 diff hist −137‎ Let Me In (film) ‎ Undid revision 391674518 by 142.177.27.58 ( talk)read the discussion page the creators of the movie and book said its not
• 16:46 16:46, 19 October 2010 diff hist −137‎ Let Me In (film) ‎ Undid revision 391666477 by 129.63.166.111 ( talk)based on the book look at the discussion page
• 16:08 16:08, 19 October 2010 diff hist −12‎ Let Me In (film) ‎ Undid revision 391657759 by 186.106.44.231 ( talk)it can still makes its money back because its still playing
• 16:07 16:07, 19 October 2010 diff hist −137‎ Let Me In (film) ‎ Undid revision 391631761 by 142.177.27.58 ( talk)
• 16:04 16:04, 19 October 2010 diff hist −8‎ Let Me In (film) ‎ Undid revision 391544505 by 71.154.213.188 ( talk)it isnt said what she taps
• 16:02 16:02, 19 October 2010 diff hist −308‎ Let Me In (film) ‎ Undid revision 391519463 by 77.99.19.254 ( talk)it is not important. their relationship in the movie is not directly stated. its OR

18 October 2010

• 18:35 18:35, 18 October 2010 diff hist −21‎ Pah-wraith ‎No edit summary
• 05:42 05:42, 18 October 2010 diff hist −2‎ Let Me In (film) ‎No edit summary
• 05:40 05:40, 18 October 2010 diff hist −309‎ Let Me In (film) ‎ Undid revision 391355687 by GekkoWallStreet ( talk)removing unneeded detailes and blatant original research
• 05:38 05:38, 18 October 2010 diff hist +1‎ Let Me In (film) ‎ Undid revision 391355817 by GekkoWallStreet ( talk)
• 05:37 05:37, 18 October 2010 diff hist +1‎ Let Me In (film) ‎ Undid revision 391375957 by 24.102.166.114 ( talk)
• 05:36 05:36, 18 October 2010 diff hist −13‎ Let Me In (film) ‎ Undid revision 391376828 by 24.102.166.114 ( talk)
• 05:31 05:31, 18 October 2010 diff hist −2‎ Dukat (Star Trek) ‎No edit summary
• 01:51 01:51, 18 October 2010 diff hist −383‎ Let Me In (film) ‎No edit summary
• 01:33 01:33, 18 October 2010 diff hist −3‎ Let Me In (film) ‎ →‎Plot
• 01:32 01:32, 18 October 2010 diff hist +1,237‎ Let Me In (film) ‎ →‎Plot: fixxing a poorly wrote article with too much OR