17:4917:49, 8 September 2022diffhist−192
Talk:Phil Hine
Doubt this was back copied, and the page has a clear copyright, auto-generated on each view with current year. This has already been reviewed previouslyTags: Manual revertRevertedMobile editMobile web edit
20:1620:16, 5 September 2022diffhist−4,182
Michigan eLibrary
WP:TNT completely bizarre and repetitive prose. Contains absurdity such as using the letter S as a number. Probably a low quality effort to avoid copy vio detectionTags: section blankingMobile editMobile web edit
19:4619:46, 2 September 2022diffhist+11
Typhonian Order
Unclear if this is from the organization, a reliable source, or original research. If anyone is aware of who is making this claim, using phrasing like "Researchers/historians say", "or the organization says" would be less ambiguousTags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
17:4917:49, 8 September 2022diffhist−192
Talk:Phil Hine
Doubt this was back copied, and the page has a clear copyright, auto-generated on each view with current year. This has already been reviewed previouslyTags: Manual revertRevertedMobile editMobile web edit
20:1620:16, 5 September 2022diffhist−4,182
Michigan eLibrary
WP:TNT completely bizarre and repetitive prose. Contains absurdity such as using the letter S as a number. Probably a low quality effort to avoid copy vio detectionTags: section blankingMobile editMobile web edit
19:4619:46, 2 September 2022diffhist+11
Typhonian Order
Unclear if this is from the organization, a reliable source, or original research. If anyone is aware of who is making this claim, using phrasing like "Researchers/historians say", "or the organization says" would be less ambiguousTags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit