23:4223:42, 4 August 2009diffhist−696
User talk:TharsHammar
Returned my prose to as I wrote it. Only a complete asshole would have rewritten something I wrote and signed to something I did not write. DO NOT REWRITE ANOTHER PERSONS COMMENTS
20:2120:21, 4 August 2009diffhist+1,201
Talk:Susan Roesgen
It is related to the article. It's a refutation of the Gatekeepers cycle of Revert, Belittle and Ignore. The profound Bias inherently contained in such a reaction to a neutral edit is palpable
00:3200:32, 4 August 2009diffhist−109
Susan Roesgen
Removed unsupported Jenna Six claim. Wiki credits the following for breaking the story: Jenna Times, Town Talk, Chicago Tribune, Left Turn, BBC, AP, MTV, CSM, NYT and others - not CNN or RoesgenTag: section blanking
00:2800:28, 4 August 2009diffhist−863
Susan Roesgen
Removed list of things that happened to Jackson and non-notable attachment of Roesgens name as the Reporter who along with hundreds of others reported the event.
00:2600:26, 4 August 2009diffhist−568
Susan Roesgen
Removed non-notable mention of her reporting on Petersen case. Wiki is not a diary - please establish the notability of a reporter reporting.Tag: section blanking
00:2400:24, 4 August 2009diffhist−25
Susan Roesgen
Removed section heading and returned sentence to the CNN paragraph as it belongs to her CNN relationship. No notability of any kind has been suggested to her career relationship with Katrina.
22:1022:10, 3 August 2009diffhist−1,578
Susan Roesgen
There is nothing notable in listing things a reported has reported on - nor are there any references attempting to support or establish notability. Please use Talk.
23:4223:42, 4 August 2009diffhist−696
User talk:TharsHammar
Returned my prose to as I wrote it. Only a complete asshole would have rewritten something I wrote and signed to something I did not write. DO NOT REWRITE ANOTHER PERSONS COMMENTS
20:2120:21, 4 August 2009diffhist+1,201
Talk:Susan Roesgen
It is related to the article. It's a refutation of the Gatekeepers cycle of Revert, Belittle and Ignore. The profound Bias inherently contained in such a reaction to a neutral edit is palpable
00:3200:32, 4 August 2009diffhist−109
Susan Roesgen
Removed unsupported Jenna Six claim. Wiki credits the following for breaking the story: Jenna Times, Town Talk, Chicago Tribune, Left Turn, BBC, AP, MTV, CSM, NYT and others - not CNN or RoesgenTag: section blanking
00:2800:28, 4 August 2009diffhist−863
Susan Roesgen
Removed list of things that happened to Jackson and non-notable attachment of Roesgens name as the Reporter who along with hundreds of others reported the event.
00:2600:26, 4 August 2009diffhist−568
Susan Roesgen
Removed non-notable mention of her reporting on Petersen case. Wiki is not a diary - please establish the notability of a reporter reporting.Tag: section blanking
00:2400:24, 4 August 2009diffhist−25
Susan Roesgen
Removed section heading and returned sentence to the CNN paragraph as it belongs to her CNN relationship. No notability of any kind has been suggested to her career relationship with Katrina.
22:1022:10, 3 August 2009diffhist−1,578
Susan Roesgen
There is nothing notable in listing things a reported has reported on - nor are there any references attempting to support or establish notability. Please use Talk.