00:3800:38, 17 July 2024diffhist+2,176
Internet censorship in the United States
here are two more sources, and wikipedia calls the intercept left wing, so it's not " national review right-wing POV pushing', and again, if you disagree with the language, you are welcome to revise it
00:2300:23, 17 July 2024diffhist+44
New Albany, Mississippi
Undid revision
1234952199 by
MrOllie (
talk) you are the one edit warring, when you follow me from another article and revert me without giving any justification, while jacona and i are discussing the sources and the language to be usedTags: UndoReverted
00:1800:18, 17 July 2024diffhist+159
Lynching of L. Q. Ivy
Undid revision
1234916344 by
Jacona (
talk) the source is not the lynch mob, but a newspaper from a different town, of course people were prejudiced, but we have to work with the sources that we have, please inform me if you have a source that contradicts this accountTags: UndoReverted
00:1400:14, 17 July 2024diffhist+1,486
Social media
1) these are not deprecated sources and i can find more 2) what language is objectionable to you, maybe you can revise it, rather than removing the sources and the factsTags: UndoReverted
20:2120:21, 16 July 2024diffhist+44
New Albany, Mississippi
Undid revision
1234915855 by
Jacona (
talk) if you want to take up a contrary position, and oppose my revision, you should state your reasons - why do you want to remove a critical fact (that the victim of the lynching confessed), when it's in the sources which are already cited?Tags: UndoReverted
17:1717:17, 16 July 2024diffhist+80
Lynching of L. Q. Ivy
cannot be called a 'false accusation' in the infobox, because there are sources that he confessed, and was (with some uncertainty by the victim) identified, we cannot know whether the accusation was true or false, because of the conflicts between sources and the lack of any trial or professional investigationTag: Reverted
00:3800:38, 17 July 2024diffhist+2,176
Internet censorship in the United States
here are two more sources, and wikipedia calls the intercept left wing, so it's not " national review right-wing POV pushing', and again, if you disagree with the language, you are welcome to revise it
00:2300:23, 17 July 2024diffhist+44
New Albany, Mississippi
Undid revision
1234952199 by
MrOllie (
talk) you are the one edit warring, when you follow me from another article and revert me without giving any justification, while jacona and i are discussing the sources and the language to be usedTags: UndoReverted
00:1800:18, 17 July 2024diffhist+159
Lynching of L. Q. Ivy
Undid revision
1234916344 by
Jacona (
talk) the source is not the lynch mob, but a newspaper from a different town, of course people were prejudiced, but we have to work with the sources that we have, please inform me if you have a source that contradicts this accountTags: UndoReverted
00:1400:14, 17 July 2024diffhist+1,486
Social media
1) these are not deprecated sources and i can find more 2) what language is objectionable to you, maybe you can revise it, rather than removing the sources and the factsTags: UndoReverted
20:2120:21, 16 July 2024diffhist+44
New Albany, Mississippi
Undid revision
1234915855 by
Jacona (
talk) if you want to take up a contrary position, and oppose my revision, you should state your reasons - why do you want to remove a critical fact (that the victim of the lynching confessed), when it's in the sources which are already cited?Tags: UndoReverted
17:1717:17, 16 July 2024diffhist+80
Lynching of L. Q. Ivy
cannot be called a 'false accusation' in the infobox, because there are sources that he confessed, and was (with some uncertainty by the victim) identified, we cannot know whether the accusation was true or false, because of the conflicts between sources and the lack of any trial or professional investigationTag: Reverted