18:2918:29, 17 May 2012diffhist−3,506
Lessac Technologies
Reinstating revision because it is more succinct and is at least not worse than what it replaced as regards "peacock" aspects. Putting back "peacock" box for now. But please discuss on the Talk page as to what passages are objectionable.
18:2918:29, 17 May 2012diffhist−3,506
Lessac Technologies
Reinstating revision because it is more succinct and is at least not worse than what it replaced as regards "peacock" aspects. Putting back "peacock" box for now. But please discuss on the Talk page as to what passages are objectionable.