19:0819:08, 3 January 2016diffhist−7
Consciousness
sorry, reverted edited because i incorrectly parsed the poorly formatted quote as 'unencyclopaediac' language. clearly i was wrong. i hope this small edit makes it clearer for other readers (original insertion had no quotes, for starters)
06:0106:01, 29 December 2015diffhist+246
Jurisprudence
Undid revision 696864997 by
Aduclehomo (
talk) i hope real study of law doesn't use 'social science' as is currently accepted (see psychology reproducibility issues). take to talk pls. big edit
23:5323:53, 21 December 2015diffhist−426
Adam Smith
unworthy of reference in lede. to the person who reverts (prob one of ol' nobby's eton chummies): take it to talk to start the discussion pls. i think margaret thatcher lacked the morality espoused by adam ******* smith, & is therefore unworthy of mention
21:5721:57, 14 December 2015diffhist−110
Integral
Undid revision 694925634 by
Anypodetos (
talk) put it in the list of disambiguations of 'integral', otherwise take it to talk page. not worthy of being at the top of crucial MATH concept.
00:4600:46, 23 November 2015diffhist−651
Crackle (physics)
second citation is controversial to say the least (since when do physical principles, which are naturally occurring, apply to finance? finance has no NATURAL, continuous, real-valued measurements warranting such calcs!)
22:3022:30, 3 November 2015diffhist+10
Laplace transform
decent function -> well-behaved function. not sure what decent function is, so i swapped it with well-behaved (seems to be same in provided context?)
19:5519:55, 15 October 2015diffhist+332
Circumstellar disc
formatting previous edit. please fix duplicate ref if possible (don't know how to insert citation once and refer to it multiple times... seems non-trivial as i see most wiki pages with [1][2] etc being used once)
19:0819:08, 3 January 2016diffhist−7
Consciousness
sorry, reverted edited because i incorrectly parsed the poorly formatted quote as 'unencyclopaediac' language. clearly i was wrong. i hope this small edit makes it clearer for other readers (original insertion had no quotes, for starters)
06:0106:01, 29 December 2015diffhist+246
Jurisprudence
Undid revision 696864997 by
Aduclehomo (
talk) i hope real study of law doesn't use 'social science' as is currently accepted (see psychology reproducibility issues). take to talk pls. big edit
23:5323:53, 21 December 2015diffhist−426
Adam Smith
unworthy of reference in lede. to the person who reverts (prob one of ol' nobby's eton chummies): take it to talk to start the discussion pls. i think margaret thatcher lacked the morality espoused by adam ******* smith, & is therefore unworthy of mention
21:5721:57, 14 December 2015diffhist−110
Integral
Undid revision 694925634 by
Anypodetos (
talk) put it in the list of disambiguations of 'integral', otherwise take it to talk page. not worthy of being at the top of crucial MATH concept.
00:4600:46, 23 November 2015diffhist−651
Crackle (physics)
second citation is controversial to say the least (since when do physical principles, which are naturally occurring, apply to finance? finance has no NATURAL, continuous, real-valued measurements warranting such calcs!)
22:3022:30, 3 November 2015diffhist+10
Laplace transform
decent function -> well-behaved function. not sure what decent function is, so i swapped it with well-behaved (seems to be same in provided context?)
19:5519:55, 15 October 2015diffhist+332
Circumstellar disc
formatting previous edit. please fix duplicate ref if possible (don't know how to insert citation once and refer to it multiple times... seems non-trivial as i see most wiki pages with [1][2] etc being used once)